These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31477438)

  • 1. Comparing medical grade to commercial grade display in a radiation oncology environment.
    Robinson A; Fairchild MD
    Med Dosim; 2020 Summer; 45(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 31477438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of intracranial aneurysm detection using medical-grade versus commercial consumer-grade displays and different image reconstructions against the background of process optimization for telemedicine.
    Auer TA; Münzfeld H; Posch H; Stöckel J; Tietze A; Bohner G; Böning G
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):936-944. PubMed ID: 31698929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making the right software choice for clinically used equipment in radiation oncology.
    Vorwerk H; Zink K; Wagner DM; Engenhart-Cabillic R
    Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jun; 9():145. PubMed ID: 24956936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The electronic portal imaging system Siemens Beamview Plus versus the conventional verification films CEA-TVS and DuPont COL-7. A critical appraisal of visual image quality.
    Gagel B; Schramm O; Harms W; Mulhern A; Wenz F; van Kampen M; Wannenmacher M; Eble MJ
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Aug; 178(8):446-52. PubMed ID: 12240551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective clinical evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device.
    Michalski JM; Graham MV; Bosch WR; Wong J; Gerber RL; Cheng A; Tinger A; Valicenti RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Mar; 34(4):943-51. PubMed ID: 8598374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The radiation oncology workforce: a focus on medical dosimetry.
    Robinson GF; Mobile K; Yu Y
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 24630911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of medical images in planning and delivery of radiation therapy.
    Kalet IJ; Austin-Seymour MM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1997; 4(5):327-39. PubMed ID: 9292839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions.
    Langer S; Fetterly K; Mandrekar J; Harmsen S; Bartholmai B; Patton C; Bishop A; McCannel C
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 16249836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of an electronic radiation oncology patient information management system.
    Mandal A; Asthana AK; Aggarwal LM
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2008; 4(4):178-85. PubMed ID: 19052391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic targeting image-guided radiotherapy.
    Huntzinger C; Munro P; Johnson S; Miettinen M; Zankowski C; Ahlstrom G; Glettig R; Filliberti R; Kaissl W; Kamber M; Amstutz M; Bouchet L; Klebanov D; Mostafavi H; Stark R
    Med Dosim; 2006; 31(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 16690452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Recommendations in the use of portal images].
    Garcia R; Bodez V; Vial L; Le Thanh H; Reboul F
    Cancer Radiother; 2004 Nov; 8 Suppl 1():S56-60. PubMed ID: 15679248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance in radiation oncology in the United States.
    Purdy JA; Perez CA
    Rays; 1996; 21(4):505-40. PubMed ID: 9122438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in 3-dimensional radiation treatment planning systems: room-view display with real time interactivity.
    Purdy JA; Harms WB; Matthews JW; Drzymala R; Emami B; Simpson JR; Manolis J; Rosenberger FU
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Nov; 27(4):933-44. PubMed ID: 8244826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical aspects of respiration-correlated 4-D CT for radiation therapy.
    Mahesh M; Detorie N; Ford EC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):192-4. PubMed ID: 17412263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current techniques in three-dimensional CT simulation and radiation treatment planning.
    Stephenson JA; Wiley AL
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1995 Nov; 9(11):1225-32, 1235; discussion 1235-40. PubMed ID: 8703693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anniversary paper: A sampling of novel technologies and the role of medical physicists in radiation oncology.
    Balter S; Balter JM
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5641-52. PubMed ID: 19175121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of adaptive and functional imaging modalities in radiation therapy: approach and application from a radiation oncology perspective.
    Yoo DS; Wong TZ; Brizel DM
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2010 Dec; 31(6):444-61. PubMed ID: 21147372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide.
    Korreman S; Rasch C; McNair H; Verellen D; Oelfke U; Maingon P; Mijnheer B; Khoo V
    Radiother Oncol; 2010 Feb; 94(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 20153908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verification of prostate treatment setup using computed radiography for portal imaging.
    Whittington R; Bloch P; Hutchinson D; Bjarngard BE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 11958649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.