183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31478820)
1. Intestinal incisional dehiscence rate following enterotomy for foreign body removal in 247 dogs.
Strelchik A; Coleman MC; Scharf VF; Stoneburner RM; Thieman Mankin KM
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 255(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 31478820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of patient outcomes following enterotomy versus intestinal resection and anastomosis for treatment of intestinal foreign bodies in dogs.
Lopez DJ; Holm SA; Korten B; Baum JI; Flanders JA; Sumner JP
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Jun; 258(12):1378-1385. PubMed ID: 34061615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of short-term outcomes and potential risk factors for death and intestinal dehiscence following full-thickness large intestinal incisions in dogs.
Latimer CR; Lux CN; Grimes JA; Benitez ME; Culp WTN; Ben-Aderet D; Brown DC
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2019 Oct; 255(8):915-925. PubMed ID: 31573871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disposable skin staplers for closure of linear gastrointestinal incisions in dogs.
Schwartz Z; Coolman BR
Vet Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 29218712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Review of Normal Intestinal Healing, Intestinal Anastomosis, and the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Intestinal Dehiscence in Foreign Body Obstructions in Dogs.
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Ellison GW; Londoño L
Top Companion Anim Med; 2020 Nov; 41():100457. PubMed ID: 32823156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical removal of intestinal foreign bodies using a laparotomy-assisted endoscopic approach in dogs and cats and comparison with enterotomy.
Demars C; Boland L; Minier K
J Small Anim Pract; 2023 Jan; 64(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 36300788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk Factors for Dehiscence of Stapled Functional End-to-End Intestinal Anastomoses in Dogs: 53 Cases (2001-2012).
Snowdon KA; Smeak DD; Chiang S
Vet Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 26565990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of disposable skin staples for intestinal resection and anastomosis in 63 dogs: 2000 to 2014.
Rosenbaum JM; Coolman BR; Davidson BL; Daly ML; Rexing JF; Eatroff AE
J Small Anim Pract; 2016 Nov; 57(11):631-636. PubMed ID: 27709619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of cryopoor plasma for albumin replacement and continuous antimicrobial infusion for treatment of septic peritonitis in a dog.
Ropski MK; Guillaumin J; Monnig AA; Townsend K; McLoughlin MA
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2017 May; 27(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 28135411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of a surgical checklist on decreasing incisional infections following foreign body removal from the gastrointestinal tract in dogs.
Launcelott ZA; Lustgarten J; Sung J; Samuels S; Davis S; Davis GJ
Can Vet J; 2019 Jan; 60(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 30651653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frequency of Dehiscence in Hand-Sutured and Stapled Intestinal Anastomoses in Dogs.
Duell JR; Thieman Mankin KM; Rochat MC; Regier PJ; Singh A; Luther JK; Mison MB; Leeman JJ; Budke CM
Vet Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 26731599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a continuous suture pattern with a simple interrupted pattern for enteric closure in dogs and cats: 83 cases (1991-1997).
Weisman DL; Smeak DD; Birchard SJ; Zweigart SL
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1999 May; 214(10):1507-10. PubMed ID: 10340077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of preoperative septic peritonitis and anastomotic technique on the dehiscence of enterectomy sites in dogs: A retrospective review of 210 anastomoses.
Davis DJ; Demianiuk RM; Musser J; Podsiedlik M; Hauptman J
Vet Surg; 2018 Jan; 47(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 28885694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of intraoperative leak testing of small intestinal anastomoses performed by hand-sewn and stapled techniques in dogs: 131 cases (2008-2019).
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Fox-Alvarez WA; Case JB; Ellison GW; Colee J
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 May; 258(9):991-998. PubMed ID: 33856865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of suture reinforcement for stapled intestinal anastomoses: 77 dogs (2008-2018).
Sumner SM; Regier PJ; Case JB; Ellison GW
Vet Surg; 2019 Oct; 48(7):1188-1193. PubMed ID: 31270826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-abdominal complications following intestinal anastomoses by suture and staple techniques in dogs.
DePompeo CM; Bond L; George YE; Mezzles MJ; Brourman JD; Chandler JC; Murphy SM; Pike F; Mason DR
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2018 Aug; 253(4):437-443. PubMed ID: 30058972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of dogs undergoing immediate or delayed surgical treatment for gastrointestinal foreign body obstruction: A retrospective study by the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery.
Maxwell EA; Dugat DR; Waltenburg M; Upchurch D; Soto-Elias P; Duffy DJ; Spector D; Petrovsky B; Payton M
Vet Surg; 2021 Jan; 50(1):177-185. PubMed ID: 32979240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of intestinal leak pressure between cadaveric canine and commercial synthetic intestinal tissue that did and did not undergo enterotomy.
Regier PJ; Fealey MJ; Kim SE; Case JB; Garcia-Pereira F
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Oct; 81(10):827-831. PubMed ID: 32969730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective evaluation of gastrointestinal foreign bodies and presurgical predictors for enterectomy versus enterotomy in dogs (2013-2016): 82 cases.
Hoffman CL; Mastrocco A; Drobatz KJ
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2022 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 34555866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of outcome in dogs undergoing single-incision laparoscopic-assisted intestinal surgery and open laparotomy for simple small intestinal foreign body removal.
Otomo A; Singh A; Valverde A; Beaufrere H; Mrotz V; Kilkenny J; Linden AZ
Vet Surg; 2019 Jun; 48(S1):O83-O90. PubMed ID: 30444260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
