171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31479397)
1. Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Using Clinical Parameters to Predict Negative and Indeterminate Findings.
Deniffel D; Zhang Y; Salinas E; Satkunasivam R; Khalvati F; Haider MA
J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):292-298. PubMed ID: 31479397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.
Falagario UG; Martini A; Wajswol E; Treacy PJ; Ratnani P; Jambor I; Anastos H; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Rastinehad AR; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):700-704. PubMed ID: 31548130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?
Oishi M; Shin T; Ohe C; Nassiri N; Palmer SL; Aron M; Ashrafi AN; Cacciamani GE; Chen F; Duddalwar V; Stern MC; Ukimura O; Gill IS; Luis de Castro Abreu A
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):268-276. PubMed ID: 30189186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining a Cohort that May Not Require Repeat Prostate Biopsy Based on PCA3 Score and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Dual Negative Effect.
Perlis N; Al-Kasab T; Ahmad A; Goldberg E; Fadak K; Sayyid R; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta A; Ghai S; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1182-1187. PubMed ID: 29175542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance (MRIAS) Trial: Use of Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Saturation Biopsy to Reduce the Frequency of Surveillance Prostate Biopsies.
Amin A; Scheltema MJ; Shnier R; Blazevski A; Moses D; Cusick T; Siriwardena A; Yuen B; van Leeuwen PJ; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Brenner P; O'Neill G; Yuen C; Delprado W; Stricker P; Thompson J
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):910-917. PubMed ID: 31825297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External Validation and Comparison of Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators Incorporating Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Saba K; Wettstein MS; Lieger L; Hötker AM; Donati OF; Moch H; Ankerst DP; Poyet C; Sulser T; Eberli D; Mortezavi A
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):719-726. PubMed ID: 31651228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and International Society of Urological Pathology Based Add-On Prediction Tool to Identify Prostate Cancer Candidates for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.
Draulans C; Everaerts W; Isebaert S; Van Bruwaene S; Gevaert T; Oyen R; Joniau S; Lerut E; De Wever L; Laenen A; Weynand B; Defraene G; Vanhoutte E; De Meerleer G; Haustermans K
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):713-718. PubMed ID: 31718396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate Health Index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict prostate cancer grade reclassification in active surveillance.
Schwen ZR; Mamawala M; Tosoian JJ; Druskin SC; Ross AE; Sokoll LJ; Epstein JI; Carter HB; Gorin MA; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2020 Sep; 126(3):373-378. PubMed ID: 32367635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate can Be Omitted in Men with PI-RADS™ 5 and Prostate Specific Antigen Density Greater than 15.
Tafuri A; Iwata A; Shakir A; Iwata T; Gupta C; Sali A; Sugano D; Mahdi AS; Cacciamani GE; Kaneko M; Cai J; Ukimura O; Duddalwar V; Aron M; Gill IS; Palmer SL; Abreu AL
J Urol; 2021 Aug; 206(2):289-297. PubMed ID: 33818141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in an Asian population.
Hsieh PF; Li WJ; Lin WC; Chang H; Chang CH; Huang CP; Yang CR; Chen WC; Chang YH; Wu HC
World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1207-1214. PubMed ID: 31440806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-institutional Clinical Tool for Predicting High-risk Lesions on 3Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Truong M; Baack Kukreja JE; Rais-Bahrami S; Barashi NS; Wang B; Nuffer Z; Park JH; Lam K; Frye TP; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Feng C; Chapin BF; Davis JW; Hollenberg G; Oto A; Eggener SE; Joseph JV; Weinberg E; Messing EM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 31200839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Pennisi M
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):774-778. PubMed ID: 29679618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
