These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31479747)

  • 21. Exploring the Effects of Online Rating and the Activeness of Physicians on the Number of Patients in an Online Health Community.
    Li Y; Ma X; Song J; Yang Y; Ju X
    Telemed J E Health; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1090-1098. PubMed ID: 30676279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of media type on shared decision processes in third-age populations.
    Reychav I; Najami I; Raban DR; McHaney R; Azuri J
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 112():45-58. PubMed ID: 29500021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring the Novel Input Attributes Affecting eWOM.
    Hussain S; Huang K; Ilyas Z; Niu B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2017. PubMed ID: 32973617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring the impact of word-of-mouth about Physicians' service quality on patient choice based on online health communities.
    Lu N; Wu H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Nov; 16(1):151. PubMed ID: 27888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
    Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Patients' decision for aesthetic surgery].
    Fansa H; Haller S
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Dec; 43(6):368-75. PubMed ID: 22241520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The interplay between eWOM information and purchase intention on social media: Through the lens of IAM and TAM theory.
    Rahaman MA; Hassan HMK; Asheq AA; Islam KMA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0272926. PubMed ID: 36067142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.
    Lagu T; Haskell J; Cooper E; Harris DA; Murray A; Gardner RL
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2542-2548. PubMed ID: 31463685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.
    Chen J; Presson A; Zhang C; Ray D; Finlayson S; Glasgow R
    J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():1-6. PubMed ID: 29804840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [German language physician rating sites].
    Strech D; Reimann S
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e61-7. PubMed ID: 22189671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the Role of Online Health Community Information in Patients' Decisions to Switch from Online to Offline Medical Services.
    Li Y; Song Y; Zhao W; Guo X; Ju X; Vogel D
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Oct; 130():103951. PubMed ID: 31473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.
    Rothenfluh F; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e127. PubMed ID: 28461285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What Predicts Patients' Willingness to Undergo Online Treatment and Pay for Online Treatment? Results from a Web-Based Survey to Investigate the Changing Patient-Physician Relationship.
    Roettl J; Bidmon S; Terlutter R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Feb; 18(2):e32. PubMed ID: 26846162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Impact of Social Media on Negative Online Physician Reviews: an Observational Study in a Large, Academic, Multispecialty Practice.
    Widmer RJ; Shepard M; Aase LA; Wald JT; Pruthi S; Timimi FK
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Jan; 34(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 30374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of Ambivalent Attitudes on the Helpfulness of Web-Based Reviews: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Large Physician Review Website.
    Dong W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Cao X
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e38306. PubMed ID: 37247213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Online Physician Reviews Do Not Reflect Patient Satisfaction Survey Responses.
    Widmer RJ; Maurer MJ; Nayar VR; Aase LA; Wald JT; Kotsenas AL; Timimi FK; Harper CM; Pruthi S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):453-457. PubMed ID: 29622095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The availability and nature of physician information on the internet.
    Mostaghimi A; Crotty BH; Landon BE
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Nov; 25(11):1152-6. PubMed ID: 20544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Influence of Physician Information on Patients' Choice of Physician in mHealth Services Using China's Chunyu Doctor App: Eye-Tracking and Questionnaire Study.
    Shan W; Wang Y; Luan J; Tang P
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e15544. PubMed ID: 31647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.