333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31480504)
1. Detection of
Paniel N; Noguer T
Foods; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31480504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of
Zambry NS; Ahmad Najib M; Awang MS; Selvam K; Khalid MF; Bustami Y; Hamzah HH; Ozsoz M; Abd Manaf A; Aziah I
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36553193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aptasensor and genosensor methods for detection of microbes in real world samples.
Paniel N; Baudart J; Hayat A; Barthelmebs L
Methods; 2013 Dec; 64(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 23872322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advancement in
Awang MS; Bustami Y; Hamzah HH; Zambry NS; Najib MA; Khalid MF; Aziah I; Abd Manaf A
Biosensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34562936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research advances of DNA aptasensors for foodborne pathogen detection.
Wu W; Yu C; Wang Q; Zhao F; He H; Liu C; Yang Q
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2020; 60(14):2353-2368. PubMed ID: 31298036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent Advances in Aptamer-Based Biosensors for Detection of
Zheng X; Gao S; Wu J; Hu X
Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():605229. PubMed ID: 33414776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biosensors for rapid detection of Salmonella in food: A review.
Shen Y; Xu L; Li Y
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2021 Jan; 20(1):149-197. PubMed ID: 33443806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aptamer Based Nanoprobes for Detection of Foodborne Virus in Food and Environment Samples: Recent Progress and Challenges.
Long W; Patra I; Rahi Alhachami F; Akhrarovich Sherbekov U; Majdi A; Abed SA
Crit Rev Anal Chem; 2022 Aug; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 35998062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aptamers and Aptasensors for Highly Specific Recognition and Sensitive Detection of Marine Biotoxins: Recent Advances and Perspectives.
Zhao L; Huang Y; Dong Y; Han X; Wang S; Liang X
Toxins (Basel); 2018 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30366456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Culture-Independent Rapid Detection Methods for Bacterial Pathogens and Toxins in Food Matrices.
Wang Y; Salazar JK
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf; 2016 Jan; 15(1):183-205. PubMed ID: 33371580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrochemical Biosensors for Rapid Detection of Foodborne Salmonella: A Critical Overview.
Cinti S; Volpe G; Piermarini S; Delibato E; Palleschi G
Sensors (Basel); 2017 Aug; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 28820458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Advances in aptamer-based biosensors for monitoring foodborne pathogens.
Bruce-Tagoe TA; Bhaskar S; Kavle RR; Jeevanandam J; Acquah C; Ohemeng-Boahen G; Agyei D; Danquah MK
J Food Sci Technol; 2024 Jul; 61(7):1252-1271. PubMed ID: 38910921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella in agro-Food and environmental samples: A review of advances in rapid tests and biosensors.
Oslan SNH; Yusof NY; Lim SJ; Ahmad NH
J Microbiol Methods; 2024 Apr; 219():106897. PubMed ID: 38342249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrochemical Aptasensors for Antibiotics Detection: Recent Achievements and Applications for Monitoring Food Safety.
Evtugyn G; Porfireva A; Tsekenis G; Oravczova V; Hianik T
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of
Mahari S; Gandhi S
Biosensors (Basel); 2022 May; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35735514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Luminescent Aptamer-Based Bioassays for Sensitive Detection of Food Allergens.
Calabria D; Zangheri M; Pour SRS; Trozzi I; Pace A; Lazzarini E; Calabretta MM; Mirasoli M; Guardigli M
Biosensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36005040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Electrochemical Aptasensors toward Clinical Diagnostics, Food, and Environmental Monitoring: Review.
Li Z; Mohamed MA; Vinu Mohan AM; Zhu Z; Sharma V; Mishra GK; Mishra RK
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 31835479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA
Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aptasensors for quantitative detection of Salmonella Typhimurium.
Ansari N; Yazdian-Robati R; Shahdordizadeh M; Wang Z; Ghazvini K
Anal Biochem; 2017 Sep; 533():18-25. PubMed ID: 28624297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advances, applications, and limitations of portable and rapid detection technologies for routinely encountered foodborne pathogens.
Quintela IA; Vasse T; Lin CS; Wu VCH
Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():1054782. PubMed ID: 36545205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
