These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31481623)

  • 21. The coevolution of warning signals.
    Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 269(1492):741-6. PubMed ID: 11934367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):348-50. PubMed ID: 17148400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Not everything is black and white: color and behavioral variation reveal a continuum between cryptic and aposematic strategies in a polymorphic poison frog.
    Willink B; Brenes-Mora E; Bolaños F; Pröhl H
    Evolution; 2013 Oct; 67(10):2783-94. PubMed ID: 24094333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey.
    Thorogood R; Kokko H; Mappes J
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 2(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 29255302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. From cues to signals: evolution of interspecific communication via aposematism and mimicry in a predator-prey system.
    Lehmann KD; Goldman BW; Dworkin I; Bryson DM; Wagner AP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91783. PubMed ID: 24614755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature.
    Stevens M; Ruxton GD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 279(1728):417-26. PubMed ID: 22113031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs.
    Darst CR; Cummings ME
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7081):208-11. PubMed ID: 16525472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of metapopulation dynamics on the survival and spread of a novel, conspicuous prey.
    Lee TJ; Speed MP
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Dec; 267(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20804773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential responses of avian and mammalian predators to phenotypic variation in Australian Brood Frogs.
    Lawrence JP; Mahony M; Noonan BP
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195446. PubMed ID: 29621321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rapid population divergence linked with co-variation between coloration and sexual display in strawberry poison frogs.
    Rudh A; Rogell B; Håstad O; Qvarnström A
    Evolution; 2011 May; 65(5):1271-82. PubMed ID: 21166789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pyrazine odour makes visually conspicuous prey aversive.
    Lindström L; Rowe C; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1463):159-62. PubMed ID: 11209885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution.
    Gamberale-Stille G; Guilford T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stabilizing selection on individual pattern elements of aposematic signals.
    Winters AE; Green NF; Wilson NG; How MJ; Garson MJ; Marshall NJ; Cheney KL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1861):. PubMed ID: 28835556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seasonal changes in diet and chemical defense in the Climbing Mantella frog (Mantella laevigata).
    Moskowitz NA; Roland AB; Fischer EK; Ranaivorazo N; Vidoudez C; Aguilar MT; Caldera SM; Chea J; Cristus MG; Crowdis JP; DeMessie B; desJardins-Park CR; Effenberger AH; Flores F; Giles M; He EY; Izmaylov NS; Lee CC; Pagel NA; Phu KK; Rosen LU; Seda DA; Shen Y; Vargas S; Murray AW; Abebe E; Trauger SA; Donoso DA; Vences M; O'Connell LA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207940. PubMed ID: 30586404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aposematism: balancing salience and camouflage.
    Barnett JB; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 27484645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog.
    Maan ME; Cummings ME
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Nov; 106(45):19072-7. PubMed ID: 19858491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.