These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31482197)
1. Efficacy of tRNS and 140 Hz tACS on motor cortex excitability seemingly dependent on sensitivity to sham stimulation. Kortuem V; Kadish NE; Siniatchkin M; Moliadze V Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):2885-2895. PubMed ID: 31482197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of 1 mA tACS and tRNS on Children/Adolescents and Adults: Investigating Age and Sensitivity to Sham Stimulation. Splittgerber M; Suwelack JH; Kadish NE; Moliadze V Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():8896423. PubMed ID: 32855633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring parameters of gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and full-spectrum transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on human pharyngeal cortical excitability. Zhang M; Cheng I; Sasegbon A; Dou Z; Hamdy S Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2021 Sep; 33(9):e14173. PubMed ID: 34081376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase of beta-frequency tACS over primary motor cortex modulates corticospinal excitability. Schilberg L; Engelen T; Ten Oever S; Schuhmann T; de Gelder B; de Graaf TA; Sack AT Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():142-152. PubMed ID: 29635161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online and offline effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Pozdniakov I; Vorobiova AN; Galli G; Rossi S; Feurra M Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3854. PubMed ID: 33594133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of transcranial random noise stimulation timing on corticospinal excitability and motor function. Hoshi H; Kojima S; Otsuru N; Onishi H Behav Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 414():113479. PubMed ID: 34302882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Three Non-Invasive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Methods for Increasing Cortical Excitability. Inukai Y; Saito K; Sasaki R; Tsuiki S; Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Masaki M; Otsuru N; Onishi H Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():668. PubMed ID: 28082887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of interhemispheric facilitation by short bursts of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Calvert GHM; Carson RG Neurosci Lett; 2023 Apr; 803():137190. PubMed ID: 36921664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting cortical circuits resonant to high-frequency oscillations in the human primary motor cortex: a TMS-tACS study. Guerra A; Ranieri F; Falato E; Musumeci G; Di Santo A; Asci F; Di Pino G; Suppa A; Berardelli A; Di Lazzaro V Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7695. PubMed ID: 32376946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent. Raco V; Bauer R; Norim S; Gharabaghi A Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1055-1060. PubMed ID: 28779945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on motor functions and motor cortical excitability. Wach C; Krause V; Moliadze V; Paulus W; Schnitzler A; Pollok B Behav Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 241():1-6. PubMed ID: 23219965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation. Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of transcranial random noise stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor performance. Abe T; Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Onishi H Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jul; 705():138-142. PubMed ID: 31028846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effects of Monophasic Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Performance in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Double-Blinded Sham-Controlled Study. Dissanayaka T; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S Brain Connect; 2022 Apr; 12(3):260-274. PubMed ID: 34963309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Isometric agonist and antagonist muscle activation interacts differently with 140-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation aftereffects at different intensities. Shorafa Y; Halawa I; Hewitt M; Nitsche MA; Antal A; Paulus W J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jul; 126(1):340-348. PubMed ID: 34191638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dissanayaka TD; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S Rev Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 28889119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway. Kawakami S; Inukai Y; Ikarashi H; Watanabe H; Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Onishi H J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 100():59-65. PubMed ID: 35421743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics. Cottone C; Cancelli A; Pasqualetti P; Porcaro C; Salustri C; Tecchio F J Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 38(3):586-594. PubMed ID: 29196322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The neurophysiological aftereffects of brain stimulation in human primary motor cortex: a Sham-controlled comparison of three protocols. Therrien-Blanchet JM; Ferland MC; Badri M; Rousseau MA; Merabtine A; Boucher E; Hofmann LH; Lepage JF; Théoret H Cereb Cortex; 2023 May; 33(11):7061-7075. PubMed ID: 36749004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortical excitability. Ho KA; Taylor JL; Loo CK J ECT; 2015 Mar; 31(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25010032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]