These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31482293)

  • 1. Gynecological and postpartum ultrasonography of cesarean uterine scar defects: a pictorial essay.
    El Agwany AS
    J Ultrasound; 2020 Dec; 23(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 31482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine niche after cesarean section: a review of diagnostic methods.
    Budny-Winska J; Pomorski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(10):726-730. PubMed ID: 34747000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
    Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of echography in the management of labor in women with uterine scar after cesarean section].
    Belousov MA; Mareeva LS; Mel'nikov AP
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):49-50. PubMed ID: 1755493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.
    Ryo E; Sakurai R; Kamata H; Seto M; Morita M; Ayabe T
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 27033868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic evaluation of surgical repair of uterine cesarean scar defects.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Oct; 45(8):455-460. PubMed ID: 28186617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect "Isthmocele".
    Urman B; Arslan T; Aksu S; Taskiran C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):857-8. PubMed ID: 27006058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic and vaginal repair of uterine scar dehiscence following cesarean section as detected by ultrasound.
    Klemm P; Koehler C; Mangler M; Schneider U; Schneider A
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 16207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uterine scar defect at 12 weeks' gestation.
    Demers S; Roberge S; Girard M; Brassard N; Bujold E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Sep; 36(9):759. PubMed ID: 25222351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Echographic and morphological parallels in the evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar].
    Lebedev VA; Strizhakov AN; Zheleznov BI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):44-9. PubMed ID: 1755492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section.
    Kellner H; Horky A; Louwen F; Bahlmann F; Al Naimi A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 310(1):485-491. PubMed ID: 38695973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scar Tissue after a Cesarean Section-The Management of Different Complications in Pregnant Women.
    Stupak A; Kondracka A; Fronczek A; Kwaśniewska A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(22):. PubMed ID: 34831752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Niche" czyli ubytek w miejscu blizny mięśniówki macicy po cięciu cesarskim - przyczyny, diagnostyka, objawy.
    Abacjew-Chmyłko A; Wydra DG; Olszewska H
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 27306292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
    Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
    Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Zimmer M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():365. PubMed ID: 25733122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the final sonographic assessment of the cesarean section scar be predicted 6 weeks after the operation?
    Dosedla E; Calda P
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):718-720. PubMed ID: 27751422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.