381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31482321)
1. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Fu Q; Xu Y; Zuo J; An J; Huang M; Yang X; Chen J; Yan H; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 33626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dose and catheter optimization algorithms in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Varfalvy N; Aubin S; Beaulieu L
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 26561276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the IPSA and HIPO algorithms for interstitial tongue high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Choi CH; Park SY; Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Kim JI
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205229. PubMed ID: 30286187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame.
Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric and Radiobiological Evaluation of Hybrid Inverse Planning and Optimization for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy.
Matias Ldos S; Palmqvist T; Wolke J; Nilsson J; Beskow C; Maphossa AM; Toma-Dasu I
Anticancer Res; 2015 Nov; 35(11):6091-6. PubMed ID: 26504034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plan quality score to evaluate the dwell time deviation restricted inverse planning by simulated annealing and graphically optimized treatment plans for template based interstitial brachytherapy.
Mondal K; Muskaan ; Mourya A; Choudhary S; Mandal A; Singh A; Aggarwal LM
Cancer Radiother; 2023 May; 27(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 37088572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the role of constrained CVT and CVT in HIPO inverse planning for HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Sachpazidis I; Hense J; Mavroidis P; Gainey M; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2955-2968. PubMed ID: 31055834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.
Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverse planning for combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Yoshio K; Murakami N; Morota M; Harada K; Kitaguchi M; Yamagishi K; Sekii S; Takahashi K; Inaba K; Mayahara H; Ito Y; Sumi M; Kanazawa S; Itami J
J Radiat Res; 2013 Nov; 54(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 23728322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
