These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Transfer and priming of surgical skills across minimally invasive surgical platforms. Zihni A; Ge T; Ray S; Wang R; Liang Z; Cavallo JA; Awad MM J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 27916374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels. Zárate Rodriguez JG; Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Ray S; Cho S; Awad MM Surg Endosc; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1938-1943. PubMed ID: 30350099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Stefanidis D; Wang F; Korndorffer JR; Dunne JB; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 19536599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Residents perform better technically, have less stress and workload, and prefer robotic to laparoscopic technique during inanimate simulation. Choi SH; Kuchta K; Rojas A; Mehdi SA; Ramirez Barriga M; Hays S; Talamonti MS; Hogg ME Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7230-7237. PubMed ID: 37395804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Surgery Is Less Physically Demanding Than Laparoscopic Surgery: Paired Cross Sectional Study. Dalsgaard T; Jensen MD; Hartwell D; Mosgaard BJ; Jørgensen A; Jensen BR Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):106-113. PubMed ID: 29923873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. Klein MI; Warm JS; Riley MA; Matthews G; Doarn C; Donovan JF; Gaitonde K J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1089-94. PubMed ID: 22429084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules. Mouraviev V; Klein M; Schommer E; Thiel DD; Samavedi S; Kumar A; Leveillee RJ; Thomas R; Pow-Sang JM; Su LM; Mui E; Smith R; Patel V J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26753619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices. Passerotti CC; Franco F; Bissoli JC; Tiseo B; Oliveira CM; Buchalla CA; Inoue GN; Sencan A; Sencan A; do Pardo RR; Nguyen HT Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1075-84. PubMed ID: 25913053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgeons' posture and muscle strain during laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Dalager T; Jensen PT; Eriksen JR; Jakobsen HL; Mogensen O; Søgaard K Br J Surg; 2020 May; 107(6):756-766. PubMed ID: 31922258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer. Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Save our surgeons (SOS) - an explorative comparison of surgeons' muscular and cardiovascular demands, posture, perceived workload and discomfort during robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery. Krämer B; Neis F; Reisenauer C; Walter C; Brucker S; Wallwiener D; Seibt R; Gabriel J; Rieger MA; Steinhilber B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 307(3):849-862. PubMed ID: 36401096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgeons' display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy. Moore LJ; Wilson MR; McGrath JS; Waine E; Masters RS; Vine SJ Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2553-60. PubMed ID: 25427414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Lee GI; Lee MR; Clanton T; Sutton E; Park AE; Marohn MR Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):456-65. PubMed ID: 24196542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance. Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementing Cognitive Training Into a Surgical Skill Course: A Pilot Study on Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying. De Witte B; Di Rienzo F; Martin X; Haixia Y; Collet C; Hoyek N Surg Innov; 2018 Dec; 25(6):625-635. PubMed ID: 30222050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training. Farivar BS; Flannagan M; Leitman IM J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 25451717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries. Mendes V; Bruyere F; Escoffre JM; Binet A; Lardy H; Marret H; Marchal F; Hebert T J Robot Surg; 2020 Feb; 14(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 30863913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]