186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31483140)
1. Positive Oral Contrast Solution at MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Rate of Appendiceal Luminal Filling of Normal and Inflamed Appendixes.
Tang SJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DU; Pooler BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):W211-W217. PubMed ID: 31483140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
Wijetunga R; Tan BS; Rouse JC; Bigg-Wither GW; Doust BD
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 11719671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate--clinical experience in 525 cases.
Giuliano V; Giuliano C; Pinto F; Scaglione M
Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 16133622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid CT scan visualization of the appendix and early acute non-perforated appendicitis using an improved oral contrast method.
Giuliano V; Giuliano C; Pinto F; Scaglione M
Emerg Radiol; 2004 Apr; 10(5):235-7. PubMed ID: 15290466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appendiceal diverticulitis: multidetector CT features.
Osada H; Ohno H; Saiga K; Watanabe W; Okada T; Honda N
Jpn J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 30(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 22190074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.
Kim MS; Park HW; Park JY; Park HJ; Lee SY; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kwon HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 24633221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of colonic transit between polyethylene glycol and water as oral contrast vehicles in the CT evaluation of acute appendicitis.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1188-91. PubMed ID: 17056904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extraperitoneal ascending appendicitis: Usefulness of the split interfascial plane sign on MDCT.
Ku YM; Lee SL; Kim Y; Won Y
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Jun; 97(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 26564615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.
Choi D; Park H; Lee YR; Kook SH; Kim SK; Kwag HJ; Chung EC
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):574-82. PubMed ID: 14616200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast enemas in cystic fibrosis: implications of appendiceal nonfilling.
Fletcher BD; Abramowsky CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Aug; 137(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 6789640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.
Keyzer C; Cullus P; Tack D; De Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1272-81. PubMed ID: 19843741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appendiceal location analysis and review of the misdiagnosis rate of appendicitis associated with deep pelvic cecum on multidetector computed tomography.
Hong GS; Lee CW; Kim MH; Kim C
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(4):714-9. PubMed ID: 27317216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging.
Wise SW; Labuski MR; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Meilstrup JW; Holley GP; LaRusso SA; Holliman J; Ruggiero FM; Mauger D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):933-41. PubMed ID: 11264081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute appendicitis in childhood: oral contrast does not improve CT diagnosis.
Farrell CR; Bezinque AD; Tucker JM; Michiels EA; Betz BW
Emerg Radiol; 2018 Jun; 25(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 29306977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MDCT for suspected appendicitis: effect of reconstruction section thickness on diagnostic accuracy, rate of appendiceal visualization, and reader confidence using axial images.
Johnson PT; Horton KM; Kawamoto S; Eng J; Bean MJ; Shan SJ; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 19304692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Rhea JT; Milch HN; Ozonoff A; Lucey BC; Soto JA
Emerg Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):445-53. PubMed ID: 20496094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Focused CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis.
Tarulli M; Rezende-Neto J; Vlachou PA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2081-2088. PubMed ID: 30796478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
