These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31484133)
1. Optical and Electromagnetic Tracking Systems for Biomedical Applications: A Critical Review on Potentialities and Limitations. Sorriento A; Porfido MB; Mazzoleni S; Calvosa G; Tenucci M; Ciuti G; Dario P IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2020; 13():212-232. PubMed ID: 31484133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Position Repeatability Error in an Electromagnetic Tracking System for Surgical Navigation. Andria G; Attivissimo F; Di Nisio A; Lanzolla AML; Ragolia MA Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32053941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electromagnetic tracking in medicine--a review of technology, validation, and applications. Franz AM; Haidegger T; Birkfellner W; Cleary K; Peters TM; Maier-Hein L IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1702-25. PubMed ID: 24816547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated surgery of the sinuses and frontal skull base. Kral F; Puschban EJ; Riechelmann H; Pedross F; Freysinger W Rhinology; 2011 Aug; 49(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 21858270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advantages of optical compared with electromagnetic tracking. Glossop ND J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1():23-8. PubMed ID: 19182018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anser EMT: the first open-source electromagnetic tracking platform for image-guided interventions. Jaeger HA; Franz AM; O'Donoghue K; Seitel A; Trauzettel F; Maier-Hein L; Cantillon-Murphy P Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jun; 12(6):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28357627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New approaches to online estimation of electromagnetic tracking errors for laparoscopic ultrasonography. Feuerstein M; Reichl T; Vogel J; Traub J; Navab N Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Sep; 13(5):311-23. PubMed ID: 18821348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel electromagnetic tracking system for surgery navigation. Attivissimo F; Lanzolla AML; Carlone S; Larizza P; Brunetti G Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2018 Dec; 23(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 30497291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A software solution to dynamically reduce metallic distortions of electromagnetic tracking systems for image-guided surgery. Li M; Hansen C; Rose G Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Sep; 12(9):1621-1633. PubMed ID: 28258402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multisensor data fusion in an integrated tracking system for endoscopic surgery. Ren H; Rank D; Merdes M; Stallkamp J; Kazanzides P IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 Jan; 16(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 21827975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated lateral skull base surgery. Kral F; Puschban EJ; Riechelmann H; Freysinger W Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 23661534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical Note: Assessment of electromagnetic tracking systems in a surgical environment using ultrasonography and ureteroscopy instruments for percutaneous renal access. Gomes-Fonseca J; Veloso F; Queirós S; Morais P; Pinho ACM; Fonseca JC; Correia-Pinto J; Lima E; Vilaça JL Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31661566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electromagnetic tracking in image-guided laparoscopic surgery: Comparison with optical tracking and feasibility study of a combined laparoscope and laparoscopic ultrasound system. Xiao G; Bonmati E; Thompson S; Evans J; Hipwell J; Nikitichev D; Gurusamy K; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ; Davidson B; Clarkson MJ Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5094-5104. PubMed ID: 30247765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery. Zhang H; Banovac F; Lin R; Glossop N; Wood BJ; Lindisch D; Levy E; Cleary K Comput Aided Surg; 2006 May; 11(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16829506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optical coordinate tracking system using afocal optics for image-guided surgery. Chae YS; Lee SH; Lee HK; Kim MY Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Feb; 10(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 24898406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous Electromagnetic Tracking and Calibration for Dynamic Field Distortion Compensation. Sadjadi H; Hashtrudi-Zaad K; Fichtinger G IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 26595908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the da Vinci surgical robot on electromagnetic tracking in a clinical environment. Aguilera Saiz L; Groen HC; Heerink WJ; Ruers TJM J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):54. PubMed ID: 38280064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment and comparison of target registration accuracy in surgical instrument tracking technologies. A T; de J PF; T L; B E; O E Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1845-1848. PubMed ID: 30440755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Planar Body-Mounted Sensors for Electromagnetic Tracking. Cavaliere M; Jaeger HA; O'Donoghue K; Cantillon-Murphy P Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33923811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]