These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31484133)
21. Simultaneous localization and calibration for electromagnetic tracking systems. Sadjadi H; Hashtrudi-Zaad K; Fichtinger G Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 26018294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A novel approach to wireless electromagnetic tracking using frequency modulation radio communication. Crowley D; Cavaliere M; Cantillon-Murphy P Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Sep; 18(9):1707-1713. PubMed ID: 37386335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Electromagnetic servoing-a new tracking paradigm. Reichl T; Gardiazabal J; Navab N IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1526-35. PubMed ID: 23911947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Real-time probe tracking using EM-optical sensor for MRI-guided cryoablation. Gao W; Jiang B; Kacher DF; Fetics B; Nevo E; Lee TC; Jayender J Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29193606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monitoring of breathing motion in image-guided PBS proton therapy: comparative analysis of optical and electromagnetic technologies. Fattori G; Safai S; Carmona PF; Peroni M; Perrin R; Weber DC; Lomax AJ Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):63. PubMed ID: 28359341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing position and orientation accuracy of different electromagnetic sensors for tracking during interventions. Nijkamp J; Schermers B; Schmitz S; de Jonge S; Kuhlmann K; van der Heijden F; Sonke JJ; Ruers T Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Aug; 11(8):1487-98. PubMed ID: 26811081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer assisted positioning of the proximal segment after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: Preclinical investigation of a novel electromagnetic navigation system. Nova I; Kallus S; Berger M; Ristow O; Eisenmann U; Freudlsperger C; Hoffmann J; Dickhaus H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):748-754. PubMed ID: 28318915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device. Seeberger R; Kane G; Hoffmann J; Eggers G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 40(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 21459015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Distortion-Free Magnetic Tracking of Metal Instruments in Image-Guided Interventions. Higgins E; Crowley D; van den Bosch C; Cantillon-Murphy P Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(16):. PubMed ID: 39205058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Towards unified electromagnetic tracking system assessment-static errors. Haidegger T; Fenyvesi G; Sirokai B; Kelemen M; Nagy M; Takács B; Kovács L; Benyó B; Benyó Z Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1905-8. PubMed ID: 22254703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: a first step towards "navigated control" for liver surgery. Beller S; Eulenstein S; Lange T; Hünerbein M; Schlag PM J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2009; 16(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 19183828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using a passive coordinate measurement arm for motion tracking of a rigid endoscope for augmented-reality image-guided surgery. Lapeer RJ; Jeffrey SJ; Dao JT; García GG; Chen M; Shickell SM; Rowland RS; Philpott CM Int J Med Robot; 2014 Mar; 10(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 23712957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Lugez E; Sadjadi H; Pichora DR; Ellis RE; Akl SG; Fichtinger G Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Mar; 10(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 25193146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of 3D ultrasound probes on the accuracy of electromagnetic tracking systems. Hastenteufel M; Vetter M; Meinzer HP; Wolf I Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1359-68. PubMed ID: 16965976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Calibration of tracking systems in a surgical environment. Birkfellner W; Watzinger F; Wanschitz F; Ewers R; Bergmann H IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Oct; 17(5):737-42. PubMed ID: 9874297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraoperative compensation of magnetic field distortions for fluoroscopic and electromagnetic hybrid navigation. Cavaliere M; Cantillon-Murphy P Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Sep; 17(9):1717-1721. PubMed ID: 35599296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of navigation: a comparative study of infrared optical and electromagnetic navigation. Song EK; Seon JK; Park SJ; Yoon TR Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intracranial image-guided neurosurgery: experience with a new electromagnetic navigation system. Suess O; Kombos T; Kurth R; Suess S; Mularski S; Hammersen S; Brock M Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Sep; 143(9):927-34. PubMed ID: 11685625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a miniature electromagnetic position tracker. Hummel J; Figl M; Kollmann C; Bergmann H; Birkfellner W Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2205-12. PubMed ID: 12408292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pitfalls of electromagnetic tracking in clinical routine using multiple or adjacent sensors. Wegner I; Teber D; Hadaschik B; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Meinzer HP; Huber J Int J Med Robot; 2013 Sep; 9(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 22473654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]