These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31486004)

  • 21. Comparison between blood pressure readings using a mercury versus an aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Farhan K; Naqvi STS; Rizvi SAH; Zafar A; Rawala MS
    Blood Press Monit; 2020 Feb; 25(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 31764009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech CT40 automated blood pressure measurement device by the 1993 British Hypertension Society protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/International Organization for Standardization 81060-2: 2013 standard.
    Polo Friz H; Punzi V; Petri F; Orlandi R; Maggiolini D; Polo Friz M; Primitz L; Vighi G
    Blood Press Monit; 2017 Oct; 22(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 28763332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the Tensioday ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
    Németh Z; Móczár K; Deák G
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Jun; 7(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12131077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of the A&D UA-1020 upper-arm blood pressure monitor with six different-shaped or different-sized cuffs according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Zeng WF; Kang YY; Liu M; Li Y; Wang JG
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Oct; 18(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 24013618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Prevalence of hypertension among 18 years old and over adults in 2010-2012 in China: based on the value of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Zhao L; Yu D; Fu P; Yu W; Guo H; Yang X
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2018 Jan; 47(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29903215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Home blood pressure measurement: validation of the Braun BP 2550 (UG) monitor according to the ESH International Protocol.
    Nolly H; Romero M; Nolly A; Osso P; Reinoso O; Nolly M
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15021079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
    Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT.
    El Assaad MA; Topouchian JA; Asmar RG
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Jun; 8(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 12900590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
    Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the A&D UM-211 device for office blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.
    Fania C; Albertini F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2017 Oct; 22(5):302-305. PubMed ID: 28520592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Schiller BR-102 ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Feb; 4(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10362889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Cuckson AC; Reinders A; Shabeeh H; Shennan AH;
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 12488652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calibration of blood pressure measurements in the Jackson Heart Study.
    Seals SR; Colantonio LD; Tingle JV; Shimbo D; Correa A; Griswold ME; Muntner P
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Jun; 24(3):130-136. PubMed ID: 30998553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.