These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31486224)

  • 1. Computerising the intrapartum continuous cardiotocography does not add to its predictive value: AGAINST: Computerising the intrapartum CTG does add to its predictive value.
    Chauhan SP
    BJOG; 2019 Oct; 126(11):1364. PubMed ID: 31486224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerising the intrapartum continuous cardiotocography does not add to its predictive value: FOR: Computer analysis does not add to intrapartum continuous cardiotocography predictive value.
    Silver RM
    BJOG; 2019 Oct; 126(11):1363. PubMed ID: 31486225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ST analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring: an overview.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Miller LA
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20697240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians.
    Costa MA; Ayres-de-Campos D; Machado AP; Santos CC; Bernardes J
    J Perinat Med; 2010 Mar; 38(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 20121542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National survey of routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway.
    Kaasen A; Aanstad KJ; Pay ASD; Økland I; Blix E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Mar; 98(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 30375643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
    Pinas A; Chandraharan E
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 62: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1161-9. PubMed ID: 15863569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Usefulness of the examination of fetal blood oxygen saturation (FSpO2) and fetal heart rate (FHR) as a prognostic factor of the newborn outcome].
    Skoczylas M; Laudański T
    Ginekol Pol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1284-9. PubMed ID: 14669431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events.
    Olofsson P; Norén H; Carlsson A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Feb; 97(2):219-228. PubMed ID: 29215160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A new monitoring method for safer child delivery. Lower number of metabolic acidosis cases with fetal ECG and cardiotocography].
    Hagberg H; Amer-Wåhlin I; Herbst A; Lilja H; Norén H; Olofsson P; Marsál K
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(48):3875-6, 3878, 3880-1. PubMed ID: 15631221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: Nordic observational multicenter study.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Bördahl P; Eikeland T; Hellsten C; Norén H; Sörnes T; Rosén KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Oct; 12(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 12572595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for intrapartum fetal monitoring are not followed in low-risk women: A study from two Norwegian birth units.
    Rosset IK; Lindahl K; Blix E; Kaasen A
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2020 Dec; 26():100552. PubMed ID: 33038758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer analysis of the antepartum fetal heart rate patterns in the intrauterine growth-retarded human fetus using Sonicaid System 8000.
    Bartnicki J; Ratanasiri T; Meyenburg M; Saling E
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1991; 31(4):196-9. PubMed ID: 1885086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
    Puertas A; Góngora J; Valverde M; Revelles L; Manzanares S; Carrillo MP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continued utility of the contraction stress test?
    Huddleston JF
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 45(4):1005-14. PubMed ID: 12438878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor.
    Garabedian C; De Jonckheere J; Butruille L; Deruelle P; Storme L; Houfflin-Debarge V
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 28403965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Accuracy of fetal heart rate monitoring].
    Morgenstern J; Abels T; Somville T; Weis G; Wolf P
    Gynakologe; 1994 Jun; 27(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 7926954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antenatal cardiotocography (CTG).
    Devane D
    Pract Midwife; 2010 Oct; 13(9):35-6. PubMed ID: 21138138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An overview of central fetal monitoring systems in labour.
    Nunes I; Ayres-de-Campos D; Figueiredo C; Bernardes J
    J Perinat Med; 2013 Jan; 41(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 23093259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.