BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31486944)

  • 1. Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients.
    Warren JA; Sundaram K; Hampton R; McLaughlin J; Patterson B; Higuera CA; Piuzzi NS
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 31486944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which Fixation Device is Preferred for Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the United States? A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Niu E; Yang A; Harris AH; Bishop J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3647-55. PubMed ID: 26208608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
    Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):274-282. PubMed ID: 35094569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
    Kuhl M; Beimel C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures.
    Warren J; Sundaram K; Anis H; McLaughlin J; Patterson B; Higuera CA; Piuzzi NS
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Oct; 29(7):1419-1427. PubMed ID: 31134326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Short-term Complication Rates Between Cephalomedullary Hip Screw Devices and Sliding Hip Screws: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Pandarinath R; Amdur R; DeBritz JN; Rao RD
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Dec; 26(23):845-851. PubMed ID: 30252786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of life, walking ability and change of living situation after trochanteric femur fracture in geriatric patients-Comparison between sliding hip screw and cephalomedullary nails from the registry for geriatric trauma.
    Marks L; Pass B; Knobe M; Volland R; Eschbach D; Lendemans S; Aigner R; Schoeneberg C;
    Injury; 2021 Jul; 52(7):1793-1800. PubMed ID: 34039468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single screw type of lag screw results higher reoperation rate in the osteosynthesis of basicervical hip fracture.
    Kim JT; Ha YC; Park CH; Yoo JI; Kim TY
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jan; 25(1):152-155. PubMed ID: 30851995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment and outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fractures: A systematic review.
    Dekhne MS; Thomas HM; Haider T; Mortensen S; Rodriguez EK; Weaver MJ; von Keudell A
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021; 29(1):23094990211003344. PubMed ID: 33779387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total hip arthroplasty following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation treated with a cephalomedullary nail.
    Smith A; Denehy K; Ong KL; Lau E; Hagan D; Malkani A
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):91-96. PubMed ID: 31146562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up.
    Matre K; Vinje T; Havelin LI; Gjertsen JE; Furnes O; Espehaug B; Kjellevold SH; Fevang JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Feb; 95(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 23389782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing fixation methods for stable and unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nailing: A comparative biomechanical and finite element analysis study.
    Kyriakopoulos G; Panagopoulos A; Pasiou E; Kourkoulis SK; Diamantakos I; Anastopoulos G; Tserpes K; Tatani I; Lakoumentas J; Megas P
    Injury; 2022 Dec; 53(12):4072-4085. PubMed ID: 36272844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multi-center study.
    Pui CM; Bostrom MP; Westrich GH; Della Valle CJ; Macaulay W; Mont MA; Padgett DE
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):45-7. PubMed ID: 23891060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilization Trends, Patient-Demographics, and Comparison of Medical Complications of Sliding Hip Screw or Intramedullary Nail for Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Nationwide Analysis from 2005 to 2014 of the Medicare Population.
    Vakharia AM; Haase LR; Speybroeck J; Furdock R; Ina J; Ochenjele G
    Iowa Orthop J; 2023 Dec; 43(2):163-171. PubMed ID: 38213845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.