These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31487304)

  • 1. When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Dwyer PC; Chang YP; Hannay J; Algoe SB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221754. PubMed ID: 31487304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touching the base: heart-warming ads from the 2016 U.S. election moved viewers to partisan tears.
    Seibt B; Schubert TW; Zickfeld JH; Fiske AP
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):197-212. PubMed ID: 29510656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiating Between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Voters Using Facets of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social-Dominance Orientation.
    Crowson HM; Brandes JA
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Jun; 120(3):364-373. PubMed ID: 28558614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How an election loss leads to a social movement: Reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election among liberals predict later collective action and social movement identification.
    Bilali R; Godfrey EB; Freel SH
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):227-247. PubMed ID: 31894871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twitter misogyny associated with Hillary Clinton increased throughout the 2016 U.S. election campaign.
    Weaving M; Alshaabi T; Arnold MV; Blake K; Danforth CM; Dodds PS; Haslam N; Fine C
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):5266. PubMed ID: 37002316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using reappraisal to regulate negative emotion after the 2016 U.S. Presidential election: Does emotion regulation trump political action?
    Ford BQ; Feinberg M; Lam P; Mauss IB; John OP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Nov; 117(5):998-1015. PubMed ID: 29952576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?
    Shook NJ; Fitzgerald HN; Boggs ST; Ford CG; Hopkins PD; Silva NM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229432. PubMed ID: 32150550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in Mental Health Following the 2016 Presidential Election.
    Yan BW; Hsia RY; Yeung V; Sloan FA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Jan; 36(1):170-177. PubMed ID: 33128680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Mesolimbic Circuitry in Buffering Election-Related Distress.
    Tashjian SM; Galván A
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(11):2887-2898. PubMed ID: 29431648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 2000 election and the future of U.S. politics.
    Teixeira R
    Int J Health Serv; 2001; 31(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 11809015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The multidimensional politics of inequality: taking stock of identity politics in the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    McCall L; Orloff AS
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S34-S56. PubMed ID: 29114864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Krizan Z; Miller JC; Johar O
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20424035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients' perspectives on political self-disclosure, the therapeutic alliance, and the infiltration of politics into the therapy room in the Trump era.
    Solomonov N; Barber JP
    J Clin Psychol; 2018 May; 74(5):779-787. PubMed ID: 29537076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.