These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31487304)

  • 21. A Psychobiographical and Psycho-Political Comparison of Clinton and Trump.
    Elovitz PH
    J Psychohist; 2016; 44(2):90-113. PubMed ID: 29442485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ethics Versus Success? The Acceptance of Unethical Leadership in the 2016 US Presidential Elections.
    Morais C; Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3089. PubMed ID: 32038430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Micro-Expressions of Fear During the 2016 Presidential Campaign Trail: Their Influence on Trait Perceptions of Donald Trump.
    Stewart PA; Svetieva E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():608483. PubMed ID: 34149502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicted and experienced affective responses to the outcome of the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
    Kitchens MB; Corser GC; Gohm CL; VonWaldner KL; Foreman EL
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Dec; 107(3):837-46. PubMed ID: 21323142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Depolarizing American voters: Democrats and Republicans are equally susceptible to false attitude feedback.
    Strandberg T; Olson JA; Hall L; Woods A; Johansson P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0226799. PubMed ID: 32023249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election.
    Berthet V; Dorin C; Vergnaud JC; de Gardelle V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229096. PubMed ID: 32176697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Politicization during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Elections: bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach.
    Turner-Zwinkels F; van Zomeren M; Postmes T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Mar; 41(3):433-45. PubMed ID: 25630374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Temporal Dimension of System Justification: Gender Ideology Over the Course of the 2016 Election.
    Miller AL; Borgida E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1057-1067. PubMed ID: 30413132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.
    Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotional Reactions and Coping of Mexican Mixed-Status Immigrant Families in Anticipation of the 2016 Presidential Election.
    Valdez CR; Wagner KM; Minero LP
    Fam Process; 2021 Jun; 60(2):623-638. PubMed ID: 32638369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility.
    Oc B; Moore C; Bashshur MR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197848. PubMed ID: 29795642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Election-Related Post-Traumatic Stress: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Smith K
    Politics Life Sci; 2023 Nov; 42(2):179-204. PubMed ID: 37987568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors associated with post-election psychological distress: The case of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Pitcho-Prelorentzos S; Kaniasty K; Hamama-Raz Y; Goodwin R; Ring L; Ben-Ezra M; Mahat-Shamir M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Aug; 266():1-4. PubMed ID: 29787806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. If they were to vote, they would vote for us.
    Koudenburg N; Postmes T; Gordijn EH
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1506-10. PubMed ID: 22095975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The 1996 election: older voters and implications for policies on aging.
    Binstock RH
    Gerontologist; 1997 Feb; 37(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9046700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.
    Lundberg KB; Payne BK
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85680. PubMed ID: 24489666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's third presidential debate.
    Kashif F; Farooqi R; Tariq S; Nusrat A; Ashraf F; Raees A
    Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10518. PubMed ID: 36119880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assaults on Days of Campaign Rallies During the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Morrison CN; Ukert B; Palumbo A; Dong B; Jacoby SF; Wiebe DJ
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jul; 29(4):490-493. PubMed ID: 29543668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.