These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31488048)

  • 1. Using parallelized incremental meta-docking can solve the conformational sampling issue when docking large ligands to proteins.
    Devaurs D; Antunes DA; Hall-Swan S; Mitchell N; Moll M; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
    BMC Mol Cell Biol; 2019 Sep; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31488048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DINC 2.0: A New Protein-Peptide Docking Webserver Using an Incremental Approach.
    Antunes DA; Moll M; Devaurs D; Jackson KR; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
    Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e55-e57. PubMed ID: 29092940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DINC: a new AutoDock-based protocol for docking large ligands.
    Dhanik A; McMurray JS; Kavraki LE
    BMC Struct Biol; 2013; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11. PubMed ID: 24564952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PSOVina: The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking.
    Ng MC; Fong S; Siu SW
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(3):1541007. PubMed ID: 25800162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.
    Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein-small molecule docking with receptor flexibility in iMOLSDOCK.
    Sam Paul D; Gautham N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):889-900. PubMed ID: 30128925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2016 Oct; 22(10):239. PubMed ID: 27638416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Highly Flexible Ligand Docking: Benchmarking of the DockThor Program on the LEADS-PEP Protein-Peptide Data Set.
    Santos KB; Guedes IA; Karl ALM; Dardenne LE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Feb; 60(2):667-683. PubMed ID: 31922754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.
    Lorber DM; Udo MK; Shoichet BK
    Protein Sci; 2002 Jun; 11(6):1393-408. PubMed ID: 12021438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.
    Liu W; Liu Z; Liu H; Westerhoff LM; Zheng Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5645-5665. PubMed ID: 36282990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A protocol for CABS-dock protein-peptide docking driven by side-chain contact information.
    Kurcinski M; Blaszczyk M; Ciemny MP; Kolinski A; Kmiecik S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):73. PubMed ID: 28830545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random drift particle swarm optimisation algorithm for highly flexible protein-ligand docking.
    Fu Y; Chen Z; Sun J
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Nov; 457():180-189. PubMed ID: 30170044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein-ligand docking using mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLSDOCK).
    Viji SN; Prasad PA; Gautham N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2687-94. PubMed ID: 19968302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two implementations of the incremental construction algorithm in flexible docking of thrombin inhibitors.
    Knegtel RM; Bayada DM; Engh RA; von der Saal W; van Geerestein VJ; Grootenhuis PD
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1999 Mar; 13(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 10091122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.