368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31488301)
1. Insights From a Multidisciplinary Introduction of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device.
Moccetti F; Brinkert M; Seelos R; Ockert S; Bossard M; Cuculi F; Kobza R; Toggweiler S
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1730-1736. PubMed ID: 31488301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device.
Wood DA; Krajcer Z; Sathananthan J; Strickman N; Metzger C; Fearon W; Aziz M; Satler LF; Waksman R; Eng M; Kapadia S; Greenbaum A; Szerlip M; Heimansohn D; Sampson A; Coady P; Rodriguez R; Krishnaswamy A; Lee JT; Ben-Dor I; Moainie S; Kodali S; Chhatriwalla AK; Yadav P; O'Neill B; Kozak M; Bacharach JM; Feldman T; Guerrero M; Nanjundappa A; Bersin R; Zhang M; Potluri S; Barker C; Bernardo N; Lumsden A; Barleben A; Campbell J; Cohen DJ; Dake M; Brown D; Maor N; Nardone S; Lauck S; O'Neill WW; Webb JG;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007258. PubMed ID: 31296082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Van Mieghem NM; Latib A; van der Heyden J; van Gils L; Daemen J; Sorzano T; Ligthart J; Witberg K; de Kroon T; Maor N; Mangieri A; Montorfano M; de Jaegere PP; Colombo A; Roubin G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(6):613-619. PubMed ID: 28335899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device During Percutaneous EVAR and TEVAR Procedures.
Krajcer Z; Wood DA; Strickman N; Bernardo N; Metzger C; Aziz M; Bacharach JM; Nanjundappa A; Campbell J; Lee JT; Dake MD; Lumsden A; Nardone S
J Endovasc Ther; 2020 Jun; 27(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32193971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTA
De Palma R; Settergren M; Rück A; Linder R; Saleh N
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(5):954-961. PubMed ID: 29575678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and Effectiveness of MANTA Vascular Closure Device After Large-Bore Mechanical Circulatory Support: Real-World Experience.
Gupta A; Fouad L; Basir M; Neupane S; Zaidan M; Koenig G; Alqarqaz M; Villablanca PA; O'Neill WW; Alaswad K
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jul; 21(7):875-878. PubMed ID: 32327356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral access-related complications during percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation comparing single versus double Prostar XL device closure.
Saleh N; De Palma R; Settergren M; Rück A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1255-61. PubMed ID: 26332528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First Experiences with MANTA Vascular Closure Device in Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery.
Ahmad AE; Salamate S; Amer M; Sirat S; Monsefi N; Bakhtiary F
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 69(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 33225434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vascular complications with a plug-based vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Predictors and bail-outs.
van Wiechen MP; Kroon H; Hokken TW; Ooms JF; de Ronde-Tillmans MJ; Daemen J; de Jaegere PP; Van Mieghem NM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):E737-E745. PubMed ID: 33533544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency, Impact, and Predictors of Access Complications With Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.
Nuis RJ; Wood D; Kroon H; van Wiechen M; Bigelow D; Buller C; Daemen J; de Jaegere P; Krajcer Z; Webb J; Van Mieghem N
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():69-74. PubMed ID: 33612412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dedicated plug based closure for large bore access -The MARVEL prospective registry.
Kroon HG; Tonino PAL; Savontaus M; Amoroso G; Laine M; Christiansen EH; Toggweiler S; Ten Berg J; Sathananthan J; Daemen J; de Jaegere PP; Brueren GBRG; Malmberg M; Slagboom T; Moriyama N; Terkelsen CJ; Moccetti F; Gheorghe L; Webb J; Wood D; Van Mieghem NM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 May; 97(6):1270-1278. PubMed ID: 33347739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative Application Technique for the MANTA Vascular Closure Device for Percutaneous Large-Bore Arterial Access Closure: The Fluoroscopic DOT Technique.
Memon S; Goldman S; Rodriguez R; Ramlawi B; Coady PM; Gnall EM
J Endovasc Ther; 2023 Dec; 30(6):885-891. PubMed ID: 35766367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
van Wiechen MP; Tchétché D; Ooms JF; Hokken TW; Kroon H; Ziviello F; Ghattas A; Siddiqui S; Laperche C; Spitzer E; Daemen J; de Jaegere PP; Dumonteil N; Van Mieghem NM
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 33358648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FemoSeal
Gabrielli R; Rosati MS; Millarelli M; Dante A; Maiorano M; Musilli A; Chiappa R; Ventura M
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():18-24. PubMed ID: 29678650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dedicated Closure Device for Transcaval Access Closure: From Concept to First-in-Human Testing.
Rogers T; Greenbaum AB; Babaliaros VC; Stine AM; Khan JM; Schenke WH; Eng MH; Paone G; Leshnower BG; Satler LF; Waksman R; Chen MY; Lederman RJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Nov; 12(21):2198-2206. PubMed ID: 31629746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sheath Size Up and Down With Single Proglide - A Technique for Achieving Hemostasis With Use of Large Size Delivery System During Endovascular Graft Placement.
Singh G; Scalise F; Bianchi P; Cireni L; Sorropago G; Casana R; Tolva V
Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 78():190-196. PubMed ID: 34464729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The utilization of single versus double Perclose devices for transfemoral aortic valve replacement access site closure: Insights from Cleveland Clinic Aortic Valve Center.
Bazarbashi N; Ahuja K; Gad MM; Sammour YM; Kaur M; Karrthik A; Saad AM; Khubber S; Dhaliwal K; Mick SL; Navia JL; Puri R; Reed GW; Krishnaswamy A; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):442-447. PubMed ID: 31713996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative data of single versus double proglide vascular preclose technique after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation from the optimized catheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) japanese multicenter registry.
Kodama A; Yamamoto M; Shimura T; Kagase A; Koyama Y; Tada N; Takagi K; Araki M; Yamanaka F; Shirai S; Watanabe Y; Hayashida K
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):E55-E62. PubMed ID: 27785881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity-matched comparison of large-bore access closure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus Perclose: A real-world experience.
Medranda GA; Case BC; Zhang C; Rappaport H; Weissman G; Bernardo NL; Satler LF; Ben-Dor I; Rogers T; Waksman R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Sep; 98(3):580-585. PubMed ID: 34051039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
