159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31488915)
1. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Schulte N; Holling H; Bürkner PC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):262-289. PubMed ID: 37929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.
Xiao Y; Liu H; Li H
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():806. PubMed ID: 28572781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 23148475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contributions to Constructing Forced-Choice Questionnaires Using the Thurstonian IRT Model.
Sun L; Qin Z; Wang S; Tian X; Luo F
Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(2):229-250. PubMed ID: 37776890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.
Kreitchmann RS; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):294-321. PubMed ID: 36866066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.
Bürkner PC
Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1439-1472. PubMed ID: 35133553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22733226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.
Ng V; Lee P; Ho MR; Kuykendall L; Stark S; Tay L
J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 32208939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.
Morillo D; Leenen I; Abad FJ; Hontangas P; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):500-516. PubMed ID: 29881066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model.
Merk J; Schlotz W; Falter T
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1626. PubMed ID: 28979228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating and Using Block Information in the Thurstonian IRT Model.
Frick S
Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1556-1589. PubMed ID: 37640828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.
Walton KE; Cherkasova L; Roberts RD
Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 31007043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
Brown A
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory.
Dueber DM; Love AMA; Toland MD; Turner TA
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):108-128. PubMed ID: 30636784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
