These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31488915)

  • 41. Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.
    Teresi JA; Wang C; Kleinman M; Jones RN; Weiss DJ
    Psychometrika; 2021 Sep; 86(3):674-711. PubMed ID: 34251615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Using the Stan Program for Bayesian Item Response Theory.
    Luo Y; Jiao H
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Jun; 78(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 30140099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of an IRT Model by Mplus for Dichotomously Scored Responses Under Different Estimation Methods.
    Paek I; Cui M; Öztürk Gübeş N; Yang Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Aug; 78(4):569-588. PubMed ID: 30147117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
    Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Motivation and Opportunity for Socially Desirable Responding Does Not Alter the General Factor of Personality.
    Pelt DHM; Van der Linden D; Dunkel CS; Born MP
    Assessment; 2021 Jul; 28(5):1376-1396. PubMed ID: 31619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Application of Asymmetric IRT Modeling to Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice Test Items.
    Bolt DM; Lee S; Wollack J; Eckerly C; Sowles J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2175. PubMed ID: 30483187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Using SAS PROC NLMIXED to fit item response theory models.
    Sheu CF; Chen CT; Su YH; Wang WC
    Behav Res Methods; 2005 May; 37(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 16171193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A 2PLM-RANK multidimensional forced-choice model and its fast estimation algorithm.
    Zheng C; Liu J; Li Y; Xu P; Zhang B; Wei R; Zhang W; Liu B; Huang J
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38409459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?
    Valone ALY; Meade AW
    J Pers Assess; 2024 Mar; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38501713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests.
    Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
    Psychometrika; 2015 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 26608961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Novel Approach to Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models.
    Luo S; Zou H; Goetz CG; Choi D; Oakes D; Simuni T; Stebbins GT
    Mov Disord Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 8(7):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 34631944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of Differential Statement Functioning in Ipsative Tests With Multidimensional Forced-Choice Items.
    Qiu XL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Mar; 45(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 33627915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A dynamic Thurstonian item response theory of motive expression in the picture story exercise: solving the internal consistency paradox of the PSE.
    Lang JWB
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):481-500. PubMed ID: 25090428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sources of Error in IRT Trait Estimation.
    Feuerstahler LM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-375. PubMed ID: 30034054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.
    Pattanaik S; John MT; Chung S; Keller S
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Sep; 20(1):131. PubMed ID: 36068630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Using Likert-type and ipsative/forced choice items in sequence to generate a preference.
    Ried LD
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 24263015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.
    Öztürk NK; Karabatsos G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 29881088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses.
    Kuhfeld M; Soland J
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):234-260. PubMed ID: 33090818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. IRT Modeling in the Presence of Zero-Inflation With Application to Psychiatric Disorder Severity.
    Wall MM; Park JY; Moustaki I
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):583-597. PubMed ID: 29881029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.