These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31489569)

  • 41. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
    Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
    J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of root canal cleaning efficacy of selfadjusting files, protaper rotary, and manual K-Files in primary teeth - An
    Challagulla A; Chandrappa V; Akurathi R; N Mrudula KJ; Vemagiri CT; Thote K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(1):65-68. PubMed ID: 37417060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
    Özer SY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments.
    Al-Sudani D; Kaabi H; Al Gamdi A; Al Dakheel A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 25576112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Micro-CT evaluation of apical enlargement of molar root canals using rotary or reciprocating heat-treated NiTi instruments.
    Pinto JC; Pivoto-João MMB; Espir CG; Ramos MLG; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM; Tanomaru-Filho M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Aug; 27():e20180689. PubMed ID: 31411264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Comparison of effectiveness and safety between Twisted File technique and ProTaper Universal rotary full sequence based on micro-computed tomography].
    Chen XB; Chen C; Liang YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 48(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 26885917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
    van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
    J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study.
    Metzger Z; Zary R; Cohen R; Teperovich E; Paqué F
    J Endod; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1569-73. PubMed ID: 20728729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [A comparative study of three different rotary nickel titanium systems in the preparation of curved molar canals].
    Gu YX; Zhu YQ; DU R
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Apr; 18(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19417989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the root canal shaping ability of two rotary nickel-titanium systems.
    Al-Manei KK; Al-Hadlaq SM
    Int Endod J; 2014 Oct; 47(10):974-9. PubMed ID: 24387043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars.
    Subramaniam P; Tabrez TA; Babu KL
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 24683774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of twisted files, Pathfile-ProTaper system, and stainless steel hand K-files by using computed tomography.
    Gergi R; Rjeily JA; Sader J; Naaman A
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):904-7. PubMed ID: 20416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Comparison on the shaping ability of three different instruments in preparing curved molar canals].
    Zhu YQ; Gu YX; Du R
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 23(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 16285543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative study of root-canal shaping with stainless steel and rotary NiTi files performed by preclinical dental students.
    Alrahabi M
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25669210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study via a contrast radiopaque technique in vitro.
    Wei Z; Cui Z; Yan P; Jiang H
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28068971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.