These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31489704)

  • 1. Evaluation of vision screening of 5-15-year-old children in three Tongan schools: comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and Lea symbols.
    Hamm LM; Langridge F; Black JM; Anstice NS; Vuki M; Fakakovikaetau T; Grant CC; Dakin SC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 31489704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of the Parr vision test, single crowded Lea symbols and Spot vision screener for vision screening of preschool children aged 4-5 years in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
    Findlay R; Black J; Goodman L; Chelimo C; Grant CC; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 May; 41(3):541-552. PubMed ID: 33813777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
    Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
    J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of the Lea symbols chart for screening Nigerian children aged 3 to 5 years.
    Obajolowo TS; Olatunji FO; Ademola-Popoola DS; Popoola GO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Oct; 23(10):1381-1386. PubMed ID: 33047694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.
    Becker RH; Hübsch SH; Gräf MH; Kaufmann H
    Strabismus; 2000 Sep; 8(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11035563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia.
    Bušić M; Bjeloš M; Petrovečki M; Kuzmanović Elabjer B; Bosnar D; Ramić S; Miletić D; Andrijašević L; Kondža Krstonijević E; Jakovljević V; Bišćan Tvrdi A; Predović J; Kokot A; Bišćan F; Kovačević Ljubić M; Motušić Aras R
    Croat Med J; 2016 Feb; 57(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26935612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.
    Mercer ME; Drover JR; Penney KJ; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
    Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
    J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes.
    Hamm LM; Anstice NS; Black JM; Dakin SC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Nov; 38(6):596-608. PubMed ID: 30575072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
    Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM; Garvey KA; Harvey EM
    J AAPOS; 2009 Jun; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 19345596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between visual acuity charts for detecting significant refractive errors in preschoolers.
    Thomas J; Rajashekar B; Kamath A; Gogate P
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 May; 103(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 31566805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is LEA symbol better compared to Snellen chart for visual acuity assessment in preschool children?
    Vivekanand U; Gonsalves S; Bhat SS
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2019; 63(1):35-37. PubMed ID: 31198896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preschool visual acuity screening with HOTV and Lea symbols: testability and between-test agreement.
    Vision in Preschoolers Study Group
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):678-83. PubMed ID: 15365387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ophthalmological data on 4.5- to 7-year-old Danish children.
    Sandfeld L; Weihrauch H; Tubaek G; Mortzos P
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):379-383. PubMed ID: 29369530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lea symbols: visual acuity assessment and detection of amblyopia.
    Gräf MH; Becker R; Kaufmann H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 238(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10664053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Visual Acuity Measured by Lea Symbols and Patti Pics.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Tian J; Silbert DI
    Am Orthopt J; 2015; 65():94-8. PubMed ID: 26564933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months.
    Telleman MAJ; Sloot F; Benjamins J; Simonsz HJ
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 97(1):24-28. PubMed ID: 30284395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
    McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea Symbols charts for preschool vision screening.
    Hered RW; Murphy S; Clancy M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1997; 34(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9027676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.