These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31491054)

  • 1. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
    Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
    Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
    Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
    Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
    Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
    Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese.
    Sousa B
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2013; 25(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23917975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients.
    Kim E; Choi M; Lee J; Kim YA
    Healthc Inform Res; 2013 Dec; 19(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 24523990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties of the Braden scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: A systematic review.
    Mehicic A; Burston A; Fulbrook P
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2024 Aug; 83():103686. PubMed ID: 38518454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive validity and reliability of two pressure injury risk assessment scales at a neonatal intensive care unit.
    Shi Z; Li X
    Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 37798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
    Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
    Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
    Günes ÜY; Efteli E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative study on the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales].
    Lee YH; Jeong IS; Jeon SS
    Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi; 2003 Apr; 33(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 15314444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
    Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
    Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based prevention of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit.
    Cooper KL
    Crit Care Nurse; 2013 Dec; 33(6):57-66. PubMed ID: 24293556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.
    Theeranut A; Ninbanphot S; Limpawattana P
    Nurs Crit Care; 2021 Jan; 26(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 32368844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale for Patients in Intensive Care Units.
    Efteli E; Güneş Ü
    Wound Manag Prev; 2020 Feb; 66(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 32294059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.