173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31492190)
1. Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics - a retrospective comparison study.
Perenyi A; Toth F; Dimak B; Nagy R; Schoerg P; Jori J; Kiss JG; Sprinzl G; Csanady M; Rovo L
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Sep; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 31492190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
Cuda D; Murri A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation of a slim perimodiolar electrode: surgical technique in relation to intracochlear position and cochlear implant outcomes.
Heutink F; Verbist BM; Mens LHM; Huinck WJ; Mylanus EAM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 31650350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and evaluation of the modiolar research array--multi-centre collaborative study in human temporal bones.
Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Lazsig R; Aschendorff A; Lenarz T; Stöver T; Fraysse B; Marx M; Roland JT; Roland PS; Wright CG; Gantz BJ; Patrick JF; Risi F
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12(3):129-39. PubMed ID: 21917200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.
Garaycochea O; Manrique-Huarte R; Lazaro C; Huarte A; Prieto C; Alvarez de Linera-Alperi M; Manrique M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 277(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31637478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochleostomy and facial recess packing alter cochlear implant electrode location in a human cochlea model.
Dedmon MM; O'Connell BP; Yawn RJ; Rivas A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(5):489-492. PubMed ID: 29805061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.
Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Ramos de Miguel Á; Argudo AA; Borkoski Barreiro SA; Falcón González JC; Ramos Macías A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 275(6):1385-1394. PubMed ID: 29610960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear implant placement: round window approach.
Backous DD
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jan; 36(1 Suppl):1. PubMed ID: 24380531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Round window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it?
Souter MA; Briggs RJ; Wright CG; Roland PS
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jan; 32(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 21131883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.
Nguyen Y; Mosnier I; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Ferrary E; Sterkers O
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 133(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23216055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.
Tamames I; King C; Bas E; Dietrich WD; Telischi F; Rajguru SM
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():32-9. PubMed ID: 27260269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants.
Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
