BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31492190)

  • 21. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cochlear implantation requiring a retrofacial approach to the round window.
    Allen KP; Bartels LJ; Isaacson B
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):e84-6. PubMed ID: 25502454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants.
    Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanical Effects of Cochlear Implants on Residual Hearing Loss: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Lim J; Kim Y; Kim N
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 67(11):3253-3261. PubMed ID: 32191879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation.
    Ramos-Macias A; O'Leary S; Ramos-deMiguel A; Bester C; Falcon-González JC
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5S Suppl 1):S29-S37. PubMed ID: 31225820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cochlear implantation and residual hearing preservation long-term follow-up of the first consecutively operated patients using the round window approach in Uppsala, Sweden.
    Schart-Morén N; Erixon E; Li H; Rask-Andersen H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Sep; 21(5):246-259. PubMed ID: 32515304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deep insertion - round window approach by using SRA electrode.
    Skarżyński H; Matusiak M; Furmanek M; Skarzyński PH
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S4-7. PubMed ID: 24869441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hearing preservation surgery: cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic review.
    Havenith S; Lammers MJ; Tange RA; Trabalzini F; della Volpe A; van der Heijden GJ; Grolman W
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 23640087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.
    Adunka OF; Giardina CK; Formeister EJ; Choudhury B; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 May; 126(5):1193-200. PubMed ID: 26360623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The significance of microanatomy of the round window in terms of cochlear implantation].
    Kostevich IV; Kuzovkov VE; Lilenko AS; Sugarova SB
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2021; 86(5):42-47. PubMed ID: 34783472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modelling the effect of round window stiffness on residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Elliott SJ; Ni G; Verschuur CA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():155-167. PubMed ID: 27586580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preservation of Vestibular Function and Residual Hearing After Round Window Cochlear Implantation.
    Stuermer KJ; Kluenter HD; Lang-Roth R; Schwarz D; Hüttenbrink KB; Anagiotos A
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):878-882. PubMed ID: 31219963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deep round window insertion versus standard approach in cochlear implant surgery.
    Nordfalk KF; Rasmussen K; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jan; 273(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 25549811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimisation of the round window opening in cochlear implant surgery in wet and dry conditions: impact on intracochlear pressure changes.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Mittmann M; Todt I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3609-3613. PubMed ID: 26993657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Round Window Sealants on Delayed Hearing Loss in a Guinea Pig Model of Cochlear Implantation.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; O'Leary S
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Sep; 37(8):1024-31. PubMed ID: 27525617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.
    Gudis DA; Montes M; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1497-501. PubMed ID: 22972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
    Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.