173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31492190)
41. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cochlear implantation via round window or cochleostomy: Effect on hearing in an animal model.
Hod R; Attias J; Raveh E; Nageris BI
Laryngoscope; 2016 Nov; 126(11):E375-E378. PubMed ID: 27346175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Surgical anatomy of basal turn in relation to middle cranial fossa and round window as pertaining to middle fossa cochlear implant technique.
Singal A; Sahni D; Gupta T; Aggarwal A; Gupta AK
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Jul; 43(7):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 33399918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Hearing loss patterns after cochlear implantation via the round window in an animal model.
Attias J; Hod R; Raveh E; Mizrachi A; Avraham KB; Lenz DR; Nageris BI
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 26954875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Hearing preservation results after cochlear implantation in short-term and long-term observation].
Stanisławek-Sut O; Morawski K; Niemczyk K
Otolaryngol Pol; 2013; 67(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 23719269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Lower initial electrode impedances in minimally invasive cochlear implantation.
Liu X; Xie L; Wang Y; Yang B
Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 May; 139(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 30836805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Functional simulation of the cochlea for implant optimization.
Ceresa M; Perez F; Vera S; Carranza N; Jover JH; Mistrík P; González Ballester MA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4541-4. PubMed ID: 24110744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Variations in electrode impedance during and after cochlear implantation: Round window versus extended round window insertions.
Wang J; Sun J; Sun J; Chen J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():44-48. PubMed ID: 29106874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones.
Jwair S; Versnel H; Stokroos RJ; Thomeer HGXM
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17068. PubMed ID: 36224234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The perceived angle of the round window affects electrode insertion trauma in round window insertion - an anatomical study.
Shapira Y; Eshraghi AA; Balkany TJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 131(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 21189052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effects of insertion speed on inner ear function during cochlear implantation: a comparison study.
Rajan GP; Kontorinis G; Kuthubutheen J
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23006502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of Different Insertion Techniques of a Cochlear Implant Electrode on the Intracochlear Pressure.
Todt I; Ernst A; Mittmann P
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 26794906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Lamb Temporal Bone as a Surgical Training Model of Round Window Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.
Mantokoudis G; Huth ME; Weisstanner C; Friedrich HM; Nauer C; Candreia C; Caversaccio MD; Senn P
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26649606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Depth of Cochlear Implant Array Within the Cochlea and Performance Outcome.
Hilly O; Smith L; Hwang E; Shipp D; Symons S; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM; Lin VY
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Nov; 125(11):886-892. PubMed ID: 27443343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Preserved low-frequency hearing following 20-mm cochlear implantation.
Brown KD; Melton MF; Shonfield H; Kraskin M; Wolf J
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 25569364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion.
Leong AC; Jiang D; Agger A; Fitzgerald-O'Connor A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1237-42. PubMed ID: 22806055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Radiological and NRT-Ratio-Based Estimation of Slim Straight Cochlear Implant Electrode Positions: A Multicenter Study.
Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Christov F
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2017 Jan; 126(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27780910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Do we really need a Coupler for the round window application of an AMEI?
Schwab B; Grigoleit S; Teschner M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1181-5. PubMed ID: 23921921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
