These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31492434)

  • 1. Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A propensity matched analysis.
    Kane WJ; Charles EJ; Mehaffey JH; Hawkins RB; Meneses KB; Tache-Leon CA; Yang Z
    Surgery; 2020 Feb; 167(2):432-435. PubMed ID: 31492434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis.
    Strosberg DS; Nguyen MC; Muscarella P; Narula VK
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1436-1441. PubMed ID: 27495346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Gustafson M; Lescouflair T; Kimball R; Daoud I
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2276-80. PubMed ID: 26675933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ROBOtic Care Outcomes Project for acute gallbladder pathology.
    Greenberg S; Abou Assali M; Li Y; Bossie H; Neighorn C; Wu E; Mukherjee K
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2024 Jun; 96(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 38189678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propensity score-matching analysis for single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Han DH; Choi SH; Kang CM; Lee WJ
    Int J Surg; 2020 Jun; 78():138-142. PubMed ID: 32334076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Robotic Single-Site and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Jang EJ; Kang SH; Kim KW
    JSLS; 2023; 27(4):. PubMed ID: 38045820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Aguayo E; Dobaria V; Nakhla M; Seo YJ; Hadaya J; Cho NY; Sareh S; Sanaiha Y; Benharash P
    Surgery; 2020 Oct; 168(4):625-630. PubMed ID: 32762874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Case-Control Outcome Analysis and Surgical Resident Training Implications.
    Ghanem M; Shaheen S; Blebea J; Tuma F; Zayout M; Conti N; Qudah G; Kamel MK
    Cureus; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e7641. PubMed ID: 32399373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic single-site versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which is cheaper? A cost report and analysis.
    Bedeir K; Mann A; Youssef Y
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jan; 30(1):267-72. PubMed ID: 25861905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic cholecystectomy using Senhance robotic platform versus laparoscopic conventional cholecystectomy: a propensity score analysis.
    Samalavicius NE; Kaminskas T; Zidonis Z; Janusonis V; Deduchovas O; Eismontas V; Nausediene V; Dulskas A
    Acta Chir Belg; 2022 Jun; 122(3):160-163. PubMed ID: 33502944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures.
    Higgins RM; Frelich MJ; Bosler ME; Gould JC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):185-192. PubMed ID: 27139704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of robotic cholecystectomy on private practice in a community teaching hospital.
    Hawasli A; Sahly M; Meguid A; Edhayan E; Guiao C; Szpunar S
    Am J Surg; 2016 Mar; 211(3):610-4. PubMed ID: 26806014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study.
    Breitenstein S; Nocito A; Puhan M; Held U; Weber M; Clavien PA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Jun; 247(6):987-93. PubMed ID: 18520226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perioperative safety of laparoscopic versus robotic gastric bypass: a propensity matched analysis of early experience.
    Celio AC; Kasten KR; Schwoerer A; Pories WJ; Spaniolas K
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1847-1852. PubMed ID: 28844577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic single-site versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched analysis of short- and long-term costs.
    Hagen ME; Balaphas A; Podetta M; Rohner P; Jung MK; Buchs NC; Buehler L; Mendoza JM; Morel P
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1550-1555. PubMed ID: 29052069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Al-Mazrou AM; Chiuzan C; Kiran RP
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1415-1421. PubMed ID: 28685223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
    Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of robotic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review.
    Corzo MP; Tomey D; Martinino A; Secchi R; Elzein S; Lee YK; Abou-Mrad A; Oviedo RJ
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):93. PubMed ID: 38411776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.
    Balachandran B; Hufford TA; Mustafa T; Kochar K; Sulo S; Khorsand J
    World J Surg; 2017 May; 41(5):1246-1253. PubMed ID: 28058471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis.
    Huang Y; Chua TC; Maddern GJ; Samra JS
    Surgery; 2017 Mar; 161(3):628-636. PubMed ID: 28011011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.