BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31492443)

  • 1. Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation.
    Korevaar EW; Habraken SJM; Scandurra D; Kierkels RGJ; Unipan M; Eenink MGC; Steenbakkers RJHM; Peeters SG; Zindler JD; Hoogeman M; Langendijk JA
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():267-274. PubMed ID: 31492443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.
    Rojo-Santiago J; Korevaar E; Perkó Z; Both S; Habraken SJM; Hoogeman MS
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Sep; 186():109729. PubMed ID: 37301261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robustness analysis of CTV and OAR dose in clinical PBS-PT of neuro-oncological tumors: prescription-dose calibration and inter-patient variation with the Dutch proton robustness evaluation protocol.
    Rojo-Santiago J; Habraken SJM; Romero AM; Lathouwers D; Wang Y; Perkó Z; Hoogeman MS
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37494944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
    Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
    Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Highly Conformal Craniospinal Radiotherapy Techniques Can Underdose the Cranial Clinical Target Volume if Leptomeningeal Extension through Skull Base Exit Foramina is not Contoured.
    Noble DJ; Ajithkumar T; Lambert J; Gleeson I; Williams MV; Jefferies SJ
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Jul; 29(7):439-447. PubMed ID: 28318880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
    Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
    Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of Photon Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Robustness in Patients With Prostate Cancer as a Proposed Benchmark for Proton Therapy Robustness Evaluation.
    Maas JA; McDonald AM; Cardan RA; Snider JW; Fiveash JB; Kole AJ
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 37748679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of robustness against setup uncertainties using probabilistic scenarios in lung cancer: a comparison of proton with photon therapy.
    Teoh S; George B; Fiorini F; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190584. PubMed ID: 31977241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
    Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
    Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties.
    Park PC; Zhu XR; Lee AK; Sahoo N; Melancon AD; Zhang L; Dong L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):e329-36. PubMed ID: 21703781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
    Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
    Loebner HA; Volken W; Mueller S; Bertholet J; Mackeprang PH; Guyer G; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
    Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4780-4793. PubMed ID: 35451087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
    Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness Recipes for Minimax Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.
    van der Voort S; van de Water S; Perkó Z; Heijmen B; Lathouwers D; Hoogeman M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):163-170. PubMed ID: 27084639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
    Shan J; Yang Y; Schild SE; Daniels TB; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5428-5440. PubMed ID: 32964474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
    Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.