These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Perseverance is required! Curt A Spinal Cord; 2019 May; 57(5):347. PubMed ID: 30962517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Controversial treatments for spinal-cord injuries. Curt A; Dietz V Lancet; 2005 Mar 5-11; 365(9462):841. PubMed ID: 15752519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design. Lammertse D; Tuszynski MH; Steeves JD; Curt A; Fawcett JW; Rask C; Ditunno JF; Fehlings MG; Guest JD; Ellaway PH; Kleitman N; Blight AR; Dobkin BH; Grossman R; Katoh H; Privat A; Kalichman M; Spinal Cord; 2007 Mar; 45(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17179970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal cord injury clinical trials translational process, review of past and proposed acute trials with reference to recommended trial guidelines. Steeves J; Blight A Handb Clin Neurol; 2012; 109():386-98. PubMed ID: 23098726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic review of the methodological quality and outcome measures utilized in exercise interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Silverman SR; Schertz LA; Yuen HK; Lowman JD; Bickel CS Spinal Cord; 2012 Oct; 50(10):718-27. PubMed ID: 22777488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of clinical trial registry use in dermatology systematic reviews. Combs T; Atakpo P; Vassar M Br J Dermatol; 2018 May; 178(5):1218-1219. PubMed ID: 29432649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting of harms in systematic reviews and their primary studies. Reeves BC BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6819. PubMed ID: 25416500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A call for "negative" outcome studies. Knopman DK; Gross RA Neurology; 2014 Jan; 82(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 24379096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Process evaluations for large clinical trials involving complex interventions. Harvey LA; Jan S Spinal Cord; 2017 Nov; 55(11):963. PubMed ID: 29099097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews. Kirkham JJ; Altman DG; Chan AW; Gamble C; Dwan KM; Williamson PR BMJ; 2018 Sep; 362():k3802. PubMed ID: 30266736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Caution urged in trial of stem cells to treat spinal-cord injury. Barde Y Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):29. PubMed ID: 19262651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors predicting publication of spinal cord injury trials registered on www.ClinicalTrials. gov. DePasse JM; Park S; Eltorai AEM; Daniels AH J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 31(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 28826165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corroborating evidence by exploring sources of bias in observational spinal cord injury studies. Kopp MA; Martus P; Watzlawick R; DeVivo MJ; Chen Y; Schwab JM Neurology; 2018 Sep; 91(10):476-479. PubMed ID: 30076272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical trials in spinal cord injury: lessons learned on the path to translation. The 2011 International Spinal Cord Society Sir Ludwig Guttmann Lecture. Lammertse DP Spinal Cord; 2013 Jan; 51(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 23165505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]