These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31493344)

  • 1. Confidence interval-based sample size determination formulas and some mathematical properties for hierarchical data.
    Usami S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():1-31. PubMed ID: 31493344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalized sample size determination formulas for experimental research with hierarchical data.
    Usami S
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):346-56. PubMed ID: 24197710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalized SAMPLE SIZE Determination Formulas for Investigating Contextual Effects by a Three-Level Random Intercept Model.
    Usami S
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):133-157. PubMed ID: 27804079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size determination for three-level randomized clinical trials with randomization at the first or second level.
    Fazzari MJ; Kim MY; Heo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):579-99. PubMed ID: 24697506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Point-biserial correlation: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, meta-analysis, and sample size determination.
    Bonett DG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():113-144. PubMed ID: 31565811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size planning for longitudinal models: accuracy in parameter estimation for polynomial change parameters.
    Kelley K; Rausch JR
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 21744968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating standardized linear contrasts of means with desired precision.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19271844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple Approach to Calculate Random Effects Model Tolerance Intervals to Set Release and Shelf-Life Specification Limits of Pharmaceutical Products.
    Montes RO; Burdick RK; Leblond DJ
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2019; 73(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 30361286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Required sample size to detect mediation in 3-level implementation studies.
    Williams NJ; Preacher KJ; Allison PD; Mandell DS; Marcus SC
    Implement Sci; 2022 Oct; 17(1):66. PubMed ID: 36183090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite population correction for two-level hierarchical linear models.
    Lai MHC; Kwok OM; Hsiao YY; Cao Q
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 28301201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-classified multilevel models improved standard error estimates of covariates in clinical outcomes - a simulation study.
    Doedens P; Ter Riet G; Boyette LL; Latour C; de Haan L; Twisk J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 May; 145():39-46. PubMed ID: 35065230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Gadermann A; Guhn M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 31072299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.
    Heo M; Kim N; Rinke ML; Wylie-Rosett J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):480-489. PubMed ID: 26988927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-efficient designs for three-arm trials with treatment delivered by health professionals: Sample sizes for a combination of nested and crossed designs.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2018 Apr; 15(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 29316807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.
    Moineddin R; Matheson FI; Glazier RH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jul; 7():34. PubMed ID: 17634107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation coefficients with precision and assurance.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3972-81. PubMed ID: 22764084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simplified Estimation and Testing in Unbalanced Repeated Measures Designs.
    Spiess M; Jordan P; Wendt M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):212-235. PubMed ID: 29736784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.