These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31493551)

  • 21. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
    Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive Accuracy of Sweep Frequency Impedance Technology in Identifying Conductive Conditions in Newborns.
    Aithal V; Kei J; Driscoll C; Murakoshi M; Wada H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):106-117. PubMed ID: 29401058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
    Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
    Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wideband Absorbance Outcomes in Newborns: A Comparison With High-Frequency Tympanometry, Automated Brainstem Response, and Transient Evoked and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Aithal S; Kei J; Driscoll C; Khan A; Swanston A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e237-50. PubMed ID: 25951046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.
    Kadirogullari P; Yalcin Bahat P; Karabuk E; Bagci Cakmak K; Seckin KD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6254-6259. PubMed ID: 33882796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in high-risk newborns.
    Salata JA; Jacobson JT; Strasnick B
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jan; 118(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9450826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for the assessment of auditory sensitivity].
    Chida E
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1998 Nov; 101(11):1335-47. PubMed ID: 9867000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in infants.
    Jakubíková J; Kabátová Z; Pavlovcinová G; Profant M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 73(4):607-12. PubMed ID: 19185924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
    Janssen T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Analysis of first-time hearing screening tests among singlets and twin neonates in neonatal intensive care unit].
    Pan L; Fang X; Zhai F; Gui Y; Bian Z; Chen J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jan; 36(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 34979619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outcome of newborn hearing screening by ABR compared with four different DPOAE pass criteria.
    Barker SE; Lesperance MM; Kileny PR
    Am J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 9(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11200191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two hearing screening programs in the same population: oto-acoustic emissions (OAE) screening in newborns and behavioral screening when infants.
    Geal-Dor M; Adelman C; Levi H; Zentner G; Stein-Zamir C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 74(12):1351-5. PubMed ID: 20869779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
    Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.