279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31494607)
1. Using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to analyse and evaluate the quality of objective structured clinical examination: a non-experimental cross-sectional design.
Tavakol M; Pinner G
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e029208. PubMed ID: 31494607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.
Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance?
Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh DM; Su C; Wood T
Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 48(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 24606627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of training in student examiner rating performance in a student-led mock OSCE.
Koo JH; Ong KY; Yap YT; Tham KY
Perspect Med Educ; 2021 Oct; 10(5):293-298. PubMed ID: 33351173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.
Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M
Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.
Kim KJ; Kim G
Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling.
McManus IC; Thompson M; Mollon J
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():42. PubMed ID: 16919156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. May student examiners be reasonable substitute examiners for faculty in an undergraduate OSCE on medical emergencies?
Iblher P; Zupanic M; Karsten J; Brauer K
Med Teach; 2015 Apr; 37(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 25186850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using video-based examiner score comparison and adjustment (VESCA) to compare the influence of examiners at different sites in a distributed objective structured clinical exam (OSCE).
Yeates P; Maluf A; Cope N; McCray G; McBain S; Beardow D; Fuller R; McKinley RB
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Oct; 23(1):803. PubMed ID: 37885005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring the Effect of Examiner Variability in a Multiple-Circuit Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
Yeates P; Moult A; Cope N; McCray G; Xilas E; Lovelock T; Vaughan N; Daw D; Fuller R; McKinley RKB
Acad Med; 2021 Aug; 96(8):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 33656012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hawks, Doves and Rasch decisions: Understanding the influence of different cycles of an OSCE on students' scores using Many Facet Rasch Modeling.
Yeates P; Sebok-Syer SS
Med Teach; 2017 Jan; 39(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 27897083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia.
Chong L; Taylor S; Haywood M; Adelstein BA; Shulruf B
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():17. PubMed ID: 30016854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Changing Examiner Stations During UK Postgraduate Surgery Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Influence Examination Reliability and Candidates' Scores?
Brennan PA; Croke DT; Reed M; Smith L; Munro E; Foulkes J; Arnett R
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 26923102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How well do second-year students learn physical diagnosis? Observational study of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
Hamann C; Volkan K; Fishman MB; Silvestri RC; Simon SR; Fletcher SW
BMC Med Educ; 2002; 2():1. PubMed ID: 11888484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does quantity ensure quality? Standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties.
Schleicher I; Leitner K; Juenger J; Moeltner A; Ruesseler M; Bender B; Sterz J; Stibane T; Koenig S; Frankenhauser S; Kreuder JG
Ann Anat; 2017 Jul; 212():55-60. PubMed ID: 28434911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience.
Lee CB; Madrazo L; Khan U; Thangarasa T; McConnell M; Khamisa K
Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1440111. PubMed ID: 29480155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and implementation of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in CMF-surgery for dental students.
Höfer SH; Schuebel F; Sader R; Landes C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):412-6. PubMed ID: 23257318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examiner fatigue in communication skills objective structured clinical examinations.
Humphris GM; Kaney S
Med Educ; 2001 May; 35(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 11328514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.
Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
