289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31494953)
1. Effect of source blur on digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5572-5592. PubMed ID: 31494953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
Qian X; Rajaram R; Calderon-Colon X; Yang G; Phan T; Lalush DS; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 19928069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-ray source motion blur modeling and deblurring with generative diffusion for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Gao M; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38640913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TU-E-217BCD-11: Evaluating the Performance of a Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System.
Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Qian X; Sprenger F; Spronk D; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Ruth C; Jing Z; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3916. PubMed ID: 28518705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Barufaldi B; Acciavatti RJ; Conant EF; Maidment ADA
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 37572187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Tucker AW; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031917. PubMed ID: 23464332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis.
Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.
Hu YH; Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5242-52. PubMed ID: 19175083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.
Choi CJ; Vent TL; Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2444-2460. PubMed ID: 38394613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
