These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31495758)

  • 1. Are orthodontic landmarks and variables in digital cephalometric radiography taken in fixed and natural head positions reliable?
    Giannopoulou MA; Kondylidou-Sidira AC; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 31495758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
    Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
    Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.
    Lindner C; Wang CW; Huang CT; Li CH; Chang SW; Cootes TF
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33581. PubMed ID: 27645567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
    Borrie F; Thomson D; McIntyre GT
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture archiving and communications systems: a study of reliability of orthodontic cephalometric analysis.
    Tan SS; Ahmad S; Moles DR; Cunningham SJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 21106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mandibular advancement on the natural position of the head: a preliminary study of 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Lin X; Liu Y; Edwards SP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 51(7):e178-82. PubMed ID: 23566537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.