211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31495935)
21. Delay-sensitive and delay-insensitive deconvolution perfusion-CT: similar ischemic core and penumbra volumes if appropriate threshold selected for each.
Man F; Patrie JT; Xin W; Zhu G; Hou Q; Michel P; Eskandari A; Jovin T; Xian J; Wang Z; Wintermark M
Neuroradiology; 2015 Jun; 57(6):573-81. PubMed ID: 25749851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of microcirculation in asymptomatic cerebral infarction with multi-parameter imaging of spectral CT.
Wu D; Yin L; Zhang Y; Lin Y; Deng W; Zheng C; Liu H; Jiang F; Lan S; Wu Q; Li H; Tang J
Brain Res Bull; 2023 Oct; 203():110775. PubMed ID: 37797749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of scan interval and bolus length on the quantitative accuracy of cerebral computed tomography perfusion analysis using a hollow-fiber phantom.
Hashimoto H; Suzuki K; Okaniwa E; Iimura H; Abe K; Sakai S
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Mar; 11(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29039068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of varying user-selected input parameters on quantitative values in CT perfusion maps.
Sanelli PC; Lev MH; Eastwood JD; Gonzalez RG; Lee TY
Acad Radiol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 15530801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Application of FT-based MMSE deconvolution method for cerebral blood flow measurement in patients with leukoaraiosis.
Sakoglu U; Huisa-Garate B; Rosenberg GA; Sood R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 27(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 19121907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kimura T; Kusahara H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2009; 8(3):107-20. PubMed ID: 19783874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Susceptibility of Tmax to tracer delay on perfusion analysis: quantitative evaluation of various deconvolution algorithms using digital phantoms.
Kudo K; Sasaki M; Østergaard L; Christensen S; Uwano I; Suzuki M; Ogasawara K; Shirato H; Ogawa A
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2011 Mar; 31(3):908-12. PubMed ID: 20859294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of CT brain perfusion methods using a realistic dynamic head phantom.
Riordan AJ; Prokop M; Viergever MA; Dankbaar JW; Smit EJ; de Jong HW
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3212-21. PubMed ID: 21815396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A model based algorithm for perfusion estimation in interventional C-arm CT systems.
Wagner M; Deuerling-Zheng Y; Möhlenbruch M; Bendszus M; Boese J; Heiland S
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031916. PubMed ID: 23464331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayesian Estimation of CBF Measured by DSC-MRI in Patients with Moyamoya Disease: Comparison with
Hara S; Tanaka Y; Hayashi S; Inaji M; Maehara T; Hori M; Aoki S; Ishii K; Nariai T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1894-1900. PubMed ID: 31601573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Iterative Reconstruction Improves Both Objective and Subjective Image Quality in Acute Stroke CTP.
Flottmann F; Kabath J; Illies T; Schneider T; Buhk JH; Fiehler J; Kemmling A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150103. PubMed ID: 26930290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mathematical Framework of Deconvolution Algorithms for Quantification of Perfusion Parameters.
Yang F; Bal SSB; Sung YF; Peng GS
Acta Neurol Taiwan; 2020 Sep; 29(3)():79-85. PubMed ID: 32996115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bayesian estimation of cerebral perfusion using reduced-contrast-dose dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion at 3T.
Nael K; Mossadeghi B; Boutelier T; Kubal W; Krupinski EA; Dagher J; Villablanca JP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):710-8. PubMed ID: 25430859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Functional cluster analysis of CT perfusion maps: a new tool for diagnosis of acute stroke?
Baumgartner C; Gautsch K; Böhm C; Felber S
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Sep; 18(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 15827821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of x-ray tube current on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by CT perfusion studies.
Murase K; Nanjo T; Ii S; Miyazaki S; Hirata M; Sugawara Y; Kudo M; Sasaki K; Mochizuki T
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5019-29. PubMed ID: 16237238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging in canine brain.
Lee S; Park S; Hong S; Kim S; Yoon J; Choi J
Front Vet Sci; 2024; 11():1298215. PubMed ID: 38528871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Reduction of radiation exposure during computed tomography perfusion using an iterative reconstruction method].
Ohmura T; Toyoshima H; Sato Y; Ishida T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Nov; 69(11):1218-24. PubMed ID: 24256644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of the arterial input function on the measured perfusion values and infarct volumetric in acute cerebral ischemia evaluated by perfusion computed tomography.
Bisdas S; Konstantinou GN; Gurung J; Lehnert T; Donnerstag F; Becker H; Vogl TJ; Koh TS
Invest Radiol; 2007 Mar; 42(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 17287644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A microfabricated phantom for quantitative MR perfusion measurements: validation of singular value decomposition deconvolution method.
Ebrahimi B; Swanson SD; Chupp TE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Nov; 57(11):. PubMed ID: 20601306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Towards robust deconvolution of low-dose perfusion CT: sparse perfusion deconvolution using online dictionary learning.
Fang R; Chen T; Sanelli PC
Med Image Anal; 2013 May; 17(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 23542422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
