These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31496572)

  • 1. A Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Four Different Restorative Materials: An
    Iftikhar N; Devashish ; Srivastava B; Gupta N; Ghambir N; Rashi-Singh
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 12(1):47-49. PubMed ID: 31496572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and a Glass Hybrid Glass Ionomer Cement.
    Kunte S; Shah SB; Patil S; Shah P; Patel A; Chaudhary S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(4):398-401. PubMed ID: 36875971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties of ion-releasing restorative materials.
    Lalovic M; Kolak V; Melih I; Nikitovic A; Trajkovic I; Milosevic M; Pejanovic D; Pesic D
    Am J Dent; 2024 Feb; 37(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 38458977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.
    Moshaverinia M; Navas A; Jahedmanesh N; Shah KC; Moshaverinia A; Ansari S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 31326149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Evaluation of Dissolution Rate of Three Different Posterior Restorative Materials used in Pediatric Dentistry: An
    Raman V; Srinivasan D; Eagappan AS; Harish SS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S20-S26. PubMed ID: 37663212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation and Comparison of Physical Properties of Cention N with Other Restorative Materials in Artificial Saliva: An
    Adsul PS; Dhawan P; Tuli A; Khanduri N; Singh A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):350-355. PubMed ID: 35991795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical property characterization of a novel directly-placed ceramic restorative material.
    Geirsson J; Bayne SC; Swift EJ; Thompson JY
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):417-21. PubMed ID: 15724753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements.
    Pereira LC; Nunes MC; Dibb RG; Powers JM; Roulet JF; Navarro MF
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 12071632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Mechanical Properties of Restorative Glass Ionomers Cements.
    Bahammam S; Nathanson D; Fan Y
    Int Dent J; 2022 Dec; 72(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 36031428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An
    Chandru TP; Chandran S; Peedikayil FC; Kottayi S; Aparna TP; Aravind A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(5):707-710. PubMed ID: 38162236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An
    Bethapudy DR; Bhat C; Lakade L; Chaudhary S; Kunte S; Patil S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 37457201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An
    Bhatia HP; Singh S; Sood S; Sharma N
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28377656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Esthetic Restorative Composite Materials: An
    Preethy NA; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Subramanian E
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(6):635-639. PubMed ID: 33976488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.
    Yap AU; Pek YS; Cheang P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative.
    Alrahlah A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29358529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements.
    Bresciani E; Barata Tde J; Fagundes TC; Adachi A; Terrin MM; Navarro MF
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2004 Dec; 12(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 20976409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Prabahar T; Chowdhary N; Konkappa KN; Vundela RR; Balamurugan S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 36865737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of the Mechanical Properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced Glass lonomer Cement.
    Chalissery VP; Marwah N; Almuhaiza M; AlZailai AM; Chalisserry EP; Bhandi SH; Anil S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):394-8. PubMed ID: 27443366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements.
    Xie D; Brantley WA; Culbertson BM; Wang G
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11203534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of two restorative reinforced glass-ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Cheang PH; Chay PL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jul; 29(7):682-8. PubMed ID: 12153459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.