These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31497070)

  • 1. Validation of a novel Kinect-based device for 3D scanning of the foot plantar surface in weight-bearing.
    Rogati G; Leardini A; Ortolani M; Caravaggi P
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2019; 12():46. PubMed ID: 31497070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semi-automatic measurements of foot morphological parameters from 3D plantar foot scans.
    Rogati G; Leardini A; Ortolani M; Caravaggi P
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2021 Mar; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 33731179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of surface characteristics on the plantar shape of feet and subjects' perceived sensations.
    Witana CP; Goonetilleke RS; Xiong S; Au EY
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 18513701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional foot shape analysis in children: a pilot analysis using three-dimensional shape descriptors.
    Varga M; Price C; Morrison SC
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Jan; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 32000830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Custom therapeutic insoles based on both foot shape and plantar pressure measurement provide enhanced pressure relief.
    Owings TM; Woerner JL; Frampton JD; Cavanagh PR; Botek G
    Diabetes Care; 2008 May; 31(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 18252899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological and statistical approaches for the assessment of foot shape using three-dimensional foot scanning: a scoping review.
    Allan JJ; Munteanu SE; Bonanno DR; Buldt AK; Choppin S; Bullas A; Pearce N; Menz HB
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2023 Apr; 16(1):24. PubMed ID: 37106385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 3D scanning versus traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology for the fabrication of orthoses: a systematic review.
    Farhan M; Wang JZ; Bray P; Burns J; Cheng TL
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2021 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 33413570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction of plantar pressures in leprosy patients by using custom made shoes and total contact insoles.
    Tang SF; Chen CP; Lin SC; Wu CK; Chen CK; Cheng SP
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 129 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 25683306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional surface models of the facial soft tissues acquired with a low-cost scanner.
    Maués CPR; Casagrande MVS; Almeida RCC; Almeida MAO; Carvalho FAR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1219-1225. PubMed ID: 29705405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a low cost 3D scanning and printing tool in the manufacture of custom-made foot orthoses: a preliminary study.
    Dombroski CE; Balsdon ME; Froats A
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Jul; 7():443. PubMed ID: 25015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative comparison of plantar foot shapes under different weight-bearing conditions.
    Tsung BY; Zhang M; Fan YB; Boone DA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 15077664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses.
    Marcy AE; Fruciano C; Phillips MJ; Mardon K; Weisbecker V
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5032. PubMed ID: 29942695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic 3D shape of the plantar surface of the foot using coded structured light: a technical report.
    Thabet AK; Trucco E; Salvi J; Wang W; Abboud RJ
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2014 Jan; 7(1):5. PubMed ID: 24456711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: a proof of concept study.
    Stanković K; Booth BG; Danckaers F; Burg F; Vermaelen P; Duerinck S; Sijbers J; Huysmans T
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():8. PubMed ID: 29541162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of foot dimensions measured from 3-dimensional foot scans in children and adolescents with Down syndrome.
    Hassan NM; Buldt AK; Shields N; Landorf KB; Menz HB; Munteanu SE
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Jun; 13(1):31. PubMed ID: 32498702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to measure children's feet: 3D foot scanning compared with established 2D manual or digital methods.
    Mueller J; Richter M; Schaefer K; Ganz J; Lohscheller J; Mueller S
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2023 Apr; 16(1):21. PubMed ID: 37061747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foot roll-over evaluation based on 3D dynamic foot scan.
    Samson W; Van Hamme A; Sanchez S; Chèze L; Van Sint Jan S; Feipel V
    Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):577-82. PubMed ID: 24119779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hard, soft and off-the-shelf foot orthoses and their effect on the angle of the medial longitudinal arch: A biplane fluoroscopy study.
    Balsdon M; Dombroski C; Bushey K; Jenkyn TR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):331-338. PubMed ID: 30762477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification and mass production technique for three-quarter shoe insoles using non-weight-bearing plantar shapes.
    Sun SP; Chou YJ; Sue CC
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 18620334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of 3D surface scanners for clinical torso and spinal deformity assessment.
    Grant CA; Johnston M; Adam CJ; Little JP
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jan; 63():63-71. PubMed ID: 30467027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.