These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31497387)
1. Estimating the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles (Cryptodira) from landmark data: an assessment of different methods. Ascarrunz E; Claude J; Joyce WG PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7476. PubMed ID: 31497387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The phylogenetic relationships of geoemydid turtles from the Eocene Messel Pit Quarry: a first assessment using methods for continuous and discrete characters. Ascarrunz E; Claude J; Joyce WG PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11805. PubMed ID: 34430073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple modes of inference reveal less phylogenetic signal in marsupial basicranial shape compared with the rest of the cranium. Weisbecker V; Beck RMD; Guillerme T; Harrington AR; Lange-Hodgson L; Lee MSY; Mardon K; Phillips MJ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jul; 378(1880):20220085. PubMed ID: 37183893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Turtle origins: insights from phylogenetic retrofitting and molecular scaffolds. Lee MS J Evol Biol; 2013 Dec; 26(12):2729-38. PubMed ID: 24256520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneously mapping and superimposing landmark configurations with parsimony as optimality criterion. Catalano SA; Goloboff PA Syst Biol; 2012 May; 61(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 22213710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometric morphometrics and anatomical network analyses reveal ecospace partitioning among geoemydid turtles from the Uinta Formation, Utah. Adrian B; Smith HF; Hutchison JH; Townsend KEB Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2022 Jun; 305(6):1359-1393. PubMed ID: 34605614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometric morphometrics, homology and cladistics: review and recommendations. Palci A; Lee MSY Cladistics; 2019 Apr; 35(2):230-242. PubMed ID: 34622971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple data sets, high homoplasy, and the phylogeny of softshell turtles (Testudines: Trionychidae). Engstrom TN; Shaffer HB; McCord WP Syst Biol; 2004 Oct; 53(5):693-710. PubMed ID: 15545250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular phylogenetics of emydine turtles: taxonomic revision and the evolution of shell kinesis. Feldman CR; Parham JF Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2002 Mar; 22(3):388-98. PubMed ID: 11884163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the turtle family Geoemydidae. Spinks PQ; Shaffer HB; Iverson JB; McCord WP Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Jul; 32(1):164-82. PubMed ID: 15186805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using genes as characters and a parsimony analysis to explore the phylogenetic position of turtles. Lu B; Yang W; Dai Q; Fu J PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79348. PubMed ID: 24278129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric morphometric character suites as phylogenetic data: extracting phylogenetic signal from gastropod shells. Smith UE; Hendricks JR Syst Biol; 2013 May; 62(3):366-85. PubMed ID: 23325808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study. Vernygora OV; Simões TR; Campbell EO Syst Biol; 2020 Nov; 69(6):1088-1105. PubMed ID: 32191335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of tree-building methods using a morphological dataset and a well-supported Hexapoda phylogeny. Francisco Barbosa F; Mermudes JRM; Russo CAM PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16706. PubMed ID: 38213769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The more, the better: the use of multiple landmark configurations to solve the phylogenetic relationships in musteloids. Catalano SA; Ercoli MD; Prevosti FJ Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):294-306. PubMed ID: 25516268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data. O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Pisani D; Donoghue PCJ Palaeontology; 2018 Jan; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 29398726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration. de Queiroz K; Poe S Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phylogeny of extant and fossil Juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets. Manos PS; Soltis PS; Soltis DE; Manchester SR; Oh SH; Bell CD; Dilcher DL; Stone DE Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):412-30. PubMed ID: 17558964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]