These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31497982)

  • 1. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the efficiency of the independent segments procedure: A direct comparison with sequential probability ratio tests.
    Erdfelder E; Schnuerch M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):501-506. PubMed ID: 34726467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative sequential methods in statistical testing: A reply to Lakens (2021) and Erdfelder and Schnuerch (2021).
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 34726468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential analysis of variance: Increasing efficiency of hypothesis testing.
    Steinhilber M; Schnuerch M; Schubert AL
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39250286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Waldian t tests: Sequential Bayesian t tests with controlled error probabilities.
    Schnuerch M; Heck DW; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 35420855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
    Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor test.
    Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD; Evans NJ; Wagenmakers EJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Dec; 54(6):3100-3117. PubMed ID: 35233752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misinterpreting p: The discrepancy between p values and the probability the null hypothesis is true, the influence of multiple testing, and implications for the replication crisis.
    Anderson SF
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):596-609. PubMed ID: 31829657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):127-139. PubMed ID: 33617275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconsideration of the type I error rate for psychological science in the era of replication.
    Carlin MT; Costello MS; Flansburg MA; Darden A
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 35404627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of one-sample two-sided sequential t-tests for application in epidemiological studies.
    van der Tweel I; Kaaks R; van Noord PA
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2781-95. PubMed ID: 8981686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninferiority and equivalence tests in sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (SMARTs).
    Ghosh P; Nahum-Shani I; Spring B; Chakraborty B
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):182-205. PubMed ID: 31497981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.
    Pramanik S; Johnson VE
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):243-261. PubMed ID: 35420854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Permutation randomization methods for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Jorgensen TD; Kite BA; Chen PY; Short SD
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):708-728. PubMed ID: 29172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests.
    Sanborn AN; Hills TT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiplicative treatment effects in randomized pretest-posttest experimental designs.
    Liu Q; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31192625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invited commentary: Comparing the independent segments procedure with group sequential designs.
    Lakens D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):498-500. PubMed ID: 34726466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.