These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31497982)
21. Case-control studies: a sequential approach. O'Neill RT; Anello C Am J Epidemiol; 1978 Nov; 108(5):415-24. PubMed ID: 727211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Sequential Probability Ratio Test: An efficient alternative to exact binomial testing for Clean Water Act 303(d) evaluation. Chen C; Gribble MO; Bartroff J; Bay SM; Goldstein L J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 192():89-93. PubMed ID: 28142127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of four sequential methods allowing for early stopping of comparative clinical trials. Sebille V; Bellissant E Clin Sci (Lond); 2000 May; 98(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 10781388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using synthetic data to improve the reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research. Grund S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A Psychol Methods; 2024 Aug; 29(4):789-806. PubMed ID: 35925728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using generalizability theory with continuous latent response variables. Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):153-178. PubMed ID: 30080056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. Kenny DA; Judd CM Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluating a theory-based hypothesis against its complement using an AIC-type information criterion with an application to facial burn injury. Vanbrabant L; Van Loey N; Kuiper RM Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):129-142. PubMed ID: 31670538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit. Lachin JM Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Continuous and group sequential conditional probability ratio tests for phase II clinical trials. Tan M; Xiong X Stat Med; 1996 Oct; 15(19):2037-51. PubMed ID: 8896138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A causal theory of error scores. van Bork R; Rhemtulla M; Sijtsma K; Borsboom D Psychol Methods; 2024 Aug; 29(4):807-826. PubMed ID: 35878074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ordering genes: controlling the decision-error probabilities. Rogatko A; Zacks S Am J Hum Genet; 1993 May; 52(5):947-57. PubMed ID: 8488844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses. Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sequential Probability Ratio Testing with Power Projective Base Method Improves Decision-Making for BCI. Liu R; Wang Y; Wu X; Cheng J Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():2948742. PubMed ID: 29348781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Causal definitions versus casual estimation: Reply to Valente et al. (2022). Brandt H Psychol Methods; 2024 Jun; 29(3):589-602. PubMed ID: 39311827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A simple, general, and efficient method for sequential hypothesis testing: The independent segments procedure. Miller J; Ulrich R Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):486-497. PubMed ID: 33017157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sequential analysis of matched dichotomous data from prospective case-control studies. Van der Tweel I; van Noord PA Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3449-64. PubMed ID: 11122507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation. Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing. Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]