These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31498656)

  • 1. Get Ready for Being Chauffeured : Passenger's Preferences and Trust While Being Driven by Human and Automation.
    Mühl K; Strauch C; Grabmaier C; Reithinger S; Huckauf A; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1322-1338. PubMed ID: 31498656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can We Study Autonomous Driving Comfort in Moving-Base Driving Simulators? A Validation Study.
    Bellem H; Klüver M; Schrauf M; Schöner HP; Hecht H; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):442-456. PubMed ID: 28005453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of male teenage passengers on male teenage drivers: findings from a driving simulator study.
    Ouimet MC; Pradhan AK; Simons-Morton BG; Divekar G; Mehranian H; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():132-9. PubMed ID: 23727554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A bivariate probit analysis of child passenger's sitting behaviour and restraint use in motor vehicle.
    Aidoo EN; Ackaah W; Appiah SK; Appiah EK; Addae J; Alhassan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():225-229. PubMed ID: 31173967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of an adult passenger on young adult drivers' driving speed: roles of an adult passenger's presence and driving tips from the passenger.
    Chung EK; Choe B; Lee JE; Lee JI; Sohn YW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jun; 67():14-20. PubMed ID: 24594361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between driver and passenger's seatbelt use: a bivariate probit analysis.
    Aidoo EN; Amoh-Gyimah R; Ackaah W
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2021 Jun; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 33535901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of users' experience and posture in a rotated swivel seating configuration.
    Bohman K; Örtlund R; Kumlin Groth G; Nurbo P; Jakobsson L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S13-S18. PubMed ID: 32835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating what level of visual information inspires trust in a user of a highly automated vehicle.
    Ma RHY; Morris A; Herriotts P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103272. PubMed ID: 33022475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.
    Lee JD; Kolodge K
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):260-277. PubMed ID: 31502885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles.
    Wang C; Zhao X; Fu R; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32962050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions.
    Eriksson A; Banks VA; Stanton NA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():227-234. PubMed ID: 28342410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 27923886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully Automated Driving: Impact of Trust and Practice on Manual Control Recovery.
    Payre W; Cestac J; Delhomme P
    Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 26646299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver seat comfort for level 3-4 autonomous vehicles.
    Mansfield NJ; Walia K; Singh A
    Work; 2021; 68(s1):S111-S118. PubMed ID: 33337412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.