These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31498804)

  • 1. Task-uninformative visual stimuli improve auditory spatial discrimination in humans but not the ideal observer.
    Cappelloni MS; Shivkumar S; Haefner RM; Maddox RK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0215417. PubMed ID: 31498804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial and cross-modal attention alter responses to unattended sensory information in early visual and auditory human cortex.
    Ciaramitaro VM; Buracas GT; Boynton GM
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 98(4):2399-413. PubMed ID: 17715196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial attention evokes similar activation patterns for visual and auditory stimuli.
    Smith DV; Davis B; Niu K; Healy EW; Bonilha L; Fridriksson J; Morgan PS; Rorden C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 22(2):347-61. PubMed ID: 19400684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in humans: dissociating detection and spatial discrimination.
    Sperdin HF; Cappe C; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3696-705. PubMed ID: 20833194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical hierarchies perform Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.
    Rohe T; Noppeney U
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Feb; 13(2):e1002073. PubMed ID: 25710328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain activity during auditory and visual phonological, spatial and simple discrimination tasks.
    Salo E; Rinne T; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 1496():55-69. PubMed ID: 23261663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral studies of auditory-visual spatial recognition and integration in rats.
    Sakata S; Yamamori T; Sakurai Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 15249987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal inference in multisensory perception.
    Körding KP; Beierholm U; Ma WJ; Quartz S; Tenenbaum JB; Shams L
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e943. PubMed ID: 17895984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 195(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 19436999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective influences of cross-modal spatial-cues on preattentive auditory processing: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Mathiak K; Hertrich I; Zvyagintsev M; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 16054843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence of auditory object formation by multimodal interaction].
    Rahne T
    HNO; 2013 Mar; 61(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 23241857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.