These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31498957)
1. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base. Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology. Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies. Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Tsolakis IA; Papaioannou W; Papadopoulou E; Dalampira M; Tsolakis AI Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis. Emir F; Ayyildiz S J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies. Emir F; Ceylan G; Ayyildiz S Eur Oral Res; 2021 May; 55(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 34250474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts. Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quantitative evaluation of printing accuracy of multi-color and multi-hardness three-dimensional printing dental model with photopolymer jetting]. Shen YR; Chen H; Ma KN; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):652-658. PubMed ID: 34275220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition. Grassia V; Ronsivalle V; Isola G; Nucci L; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):352. PubMed ID: 37268910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of 3D printing technology and print orientation on the trueness of additively manufactured definitive casts with different tooth preparations. Demirel M; Diken Türksayar AA; Donmez MB; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105244. PubMed ID: 39068858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of different designs of bulb support structures on the accuracy and weight of 3D printed maxillary obturators. An in vitro study. Osman RB; Alharbi N J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):473.e1-473.e8. PubMed ID: 38749893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the accuracy of 3 different liquid crystal display printers for dental model printing. Tsolakis IA; Lyros I; Christopoulou I; Tsolakis AI; Papadopoulos MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jul; 166(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 38647515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures. Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Compatibility between Various Intraoral Scanners and 3D Printers through an Accuracy Analysis of 3D Printed Models. Im CH; Park JM; Kim JH; Kang YJ; Kim JH Materials (Basel); 2020 Oct; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 33020417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints. Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers. Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology. Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]