These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31498957)
21. Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems. Moon W; Kim S; Lim BS; Park YS; Kim RJ; Chung SH Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33803596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts. Nestler N; Wesemann C; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 32063385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of 3D printed polymers intended for models and surgical guides printed with two different 3D printers. Johansson C; Dibes J; Rodriguez LEL; Papia E Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):339-347. PubMed ID: 33100299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of base designs on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts using two different technologies. Piedra-Cascón W; Pérez-López J; Veiga-López B; Oteo-Morilla C; Pose-Rodriguez JM; Gallas-Torreira M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):453.e1-453.e9. PubMed ID: 38714457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study. Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies. Young Kim RJ; Cho SM; Jung WS; Park JM J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Dec; 132(6):1324.e1-1324.e11. PubMed ID: 36635136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Precision and trueness of maxillary crowded models produced by 2 vat photopolymerization 3-dimensional printing techniques. Rey-Joly Maura C; Godinho J; Amorim M; Pinto R; Marques D; Jardim L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jul; 160(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 34172172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped for clear aligners therapy: A 3D imaging analysis comparing different market segments 3D printing protocols. Venezia P; Ronsivalle V; Rustico L; Barbato E; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104212. PubMed ID: 35792192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of 3D Printed Model Acquired from Different Types of Intra Oral Scanners and 3D Printers. Joteppa V; Niras S; Chokhani D; Jadhao TA; Bandgar ST; Bayaskar SG J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr; 16(Suppl 2):S1433-S1434. PubMed ID: 38882882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Build Angle: Does It Influence the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dental Restorations Using Digital Light-Processing Technology? Osman RB; Alharbi N; Wismeijer D Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 28267830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of 6 Desktop 3D Printers in Dentistry: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Biaggini F; Farronato D; Lerner H Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 May; 28(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 32347671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques. Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers. Morón-Conejo B; López-Vilagran J; Cáceres D; Berrendero S; Pradíes G Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2521-2532. PubMed ID: 36462040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla. Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models. Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases. Camardella LT; de Vasconcellos Vilella O; Breuning H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1178-1187. PubMed ID: 28554463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies. Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla. Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]