These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31499751)

  • 1. Wavelet filtering of fetal phonocardiography: A comparative analysis.
    Tomassini S; Strazza A; Sbrollini A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Fioretti S; Burattini L
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Jun; 16(5):6034-6046. PubMed ID: 31499751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection of mother wavelet and denoising algorithm for analysis of foetal phonocardiographic signals.
    Chourasia VS; Mittra AK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2009; 33(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 19484684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design methodology of a new wavelet basis function for fetal phonocardiographic signals.
    Chourasia VS; Tiwari AK
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():505840. PubMed ID: 23766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal phonocardiogram signals denoising using improved complete ensemble (EMD) with adaptive noise and optimal thresholding of wavelet coefficients.
    Cheikh F; Benhassine NE; Sbaa S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Aug; 67(4):237-247. PubMed ID: 35647890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Study on Fetal Heart Rates Estimated from Fetal Phonography and Cardiotocography.
    Ibrahim EA; Al Awar S; Balayah ZH; Hadjileontiadis LJ; Khandoker AH
    Front Physiol; 2017; 8():764. PubMed ID: 29089896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Phonocardiographic-Based Fiber-Optic Sensor and Adaptive Filtering System for Noninvasive Continuous Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring.
    Martinek R; Nedoma J; Fajkus M; Kahankova R; Konecny J; Janku P; Kepak S; Bilik P; Nazeran H
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28420215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foetal phonocardiographic signal denoising based on non-negative matrix factorization.
    Chourasia VS; Tiwari AK; Gangopadhyay R; Akant KA
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 22136609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation of foetal phonocardiographic recordings for testing of FHR extraction algorithms.
    Cesarelli M; Ruffo M; Romano M; Bifulco P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Sep; 107(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 22178069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal Heart Sounds Detection Using Wavelet Transform and Fractal Dimension.
    Koutsiana E; Hadjileontiadis LJ; Chouvarda I; Khandoker AH
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2017; 5():49. PubMed ID: 28944222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. De-noising the abdominal phonogram for foetal heart rate extraction: blind source separation versus empirical filtering.
    Jiménez-González A; James CJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1358-61. PubMed ID: 24109948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Wavelet Transform-Based Neural Network Denoising Algorithm for Mobile Phonocardiography.
    Gradolewski D; Magenes G; Johansson S; Kulesza WJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Feb; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 30813479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of single-channel signal processing methods in fetal phonocardiography.
    Barnova K; Kahankova R; Jaros R; Litschmannova M; Martinek R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0269884. PubMed ID: 35984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of fetal heart rate in healthy and pathological pregnancies using wavelet-based features.
    Spyridou KK; Hadjileontiadis LJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1908-11. PubMed ID: 18002355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denoising of the fetal heart rate signal with non-linear filtering of the wavelet transform maxima.
    Papadimitriou S; Gatzounas D; Papadopoulos V; Tzigounis V; Bezerianos A
    Int J Med Inform; 1997 May; 44(3):177-92. PubMed ID: 9291009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal identification of CHD murmur using four segment phonocardiographic signal analysis.
    Chourasia J; Chourasia V; Mittra AK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 27696921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal Electrocardiogram Extraction and Analysis Using Adaptive Noise Cancellation and Wavelet Transformation Techniques.
    Sutha P; Jayanthi VE
    J Med Syst; 2017 Dec; 42(1):21. PubMed ID: 29222728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting fetal heart sounds by means of Fractal Dimension analysis in the Wavelet domain.
    Koutsiana E; Hadjileontiadis LJ; Chouvarda I; Khandoker AH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2201-2204. PubMed ID: 29060333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Passive fetal monitoring by adaptive wavelet denoising method.
    Vaisman S; Salem SY; Holcberg G; Geva AB
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Feb; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal heart rate estimation from a single phonocardiogram signal using non-negative matrix factorization.
    Dia N; Fontecave-Jallon J; Gumery PY; Rivet B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5983-5986. PubMed ID: 31947210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Review of Recent Advances and Future Developments in Fetal Phonocardiography.
    Kahankova R; Mikolasova M; Jaros R; Barnova K; Ladrova M; Martinek R
    IEEE Rev Biomed Eng; 2023; 16():653-671. PubMed ID: 35653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.