214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31500116)
1. Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Ivanauskiene R; Skrodeniene E; Petkeviciene J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Sep; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31500116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Stelemekas M; Ivanauskiene R; Petkeviciene J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31835649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sociodemographic and lifestyle determinants of non-attendance for cervical cancer screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014.
Petkeviciene J; Ivanauskiene R; Klumbiene J
Public Health; 2018 Mar; 156():79-86. PubMed ID: 29408192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychosocial Correlates of Ever Having a Pap Test and Abnormal Pap Results in a Sample of Rural Appalachian Women.
Mark KP; Crosby RA; Vanderpool RC
J Rural Health; 2018 Mar; 34(2):148-154. PubMed ID: 28872699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception and use of Pap smear screening among rural and urban women in Romania.
Grigore M; Popovici R; Pristavu A; Grigore AM; Matei M; Gafitanu D
Eur J Public Health; 2017 Dec; 27(6):1084-1088. PubMed ID: 29020396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme by personal invitation: experience of a Lithuanian primary health care centre.
Kurtinaitienė R; Rimienė J; Labanauskaitė I; Lipunova N; Smailytė G
Acta Med Litu; 2016; 23(3):180-184. PubMed ID: 28356807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.
Horner-Johnson W; Dobbertin K; Iezzoni LI
Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25864023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Organised cervical cancer screening programme in the Belgrade municipality of Cukarica - Evaluation of process indicators.
Milenkovic M; Naumovic T; Perisic Z; Milenkovic D
J BUON; 2017; 22(1):44-47. PubMed ID: 28365934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effective analysis of recall methods for cervical cancer screening in Selangor--results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Rashid RM; Ramli S; John J; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5143-7. PubMed ID: 25040965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Fee on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance--ScreenFee, a Swedish Population-Based Randomised Trial.
Alfonzo E; Andersson Ellström A; Nemes S; Strander B
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150888. PubMed ID: 26986848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland.
Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
Int J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 128(11):2681-7. PubMed ID: 20669228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
