153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31500149)
1. Pilot-Scale Assessment of Urea as a Chemical Cleaning Agent for Biofouling Control in Spiral-Wound Reverse Osmosis Membrane Elements.
Sanawar H; Bucs SS; Pot MA; Zlopasa J; Farhat NM; Witkamp GJ; Kruithof JC; van Loosdrecht MCM; Vrouwenvelder JS
Membranes (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 31500149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced biofilm solubilization by urea in reverse osmosis membrane systems.
Sanawar H; Pinel I; Farhat NM; Bucs SS; Zlopasa J; Kruithof JC; Witkamp GJ; van Loosdrecht MCM; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res X; 2018 Dec; 1():100004. PubMed ID: 31194008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Periodic chemical cleaning with urea: disintegration of biofilms and reduction of key biofilm-forming bacteria from reverse osmosis membranes.
Sanawar H; Kim LH; Farhat NM; van Loosdrecht MCM; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res X; 2021 Dec; 13():100117. PubMed ID: 34585132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fouling of a spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane processing swine wastewater: effect of cleaning procedure on fouling resistance.
Camilleri-Rumbau MS; Masse L; Dubreuil J; Mondor M; Christensen KV; Norddahl B
Environ Technol; 2016; 37(13):1704-15. PubMed ID: 26698296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short- and long-term fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membrane at full scale leachate treatment plant.
Rukapan W; Khananthai B; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Srisukphun T
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 22173416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Permeability decline in nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes fed with municipal wastewater treated by a membrane bioreactor.
Kimura K; Ogawa N; Watanabe Y
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(9):1994-9. PubMed ID: 23656942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficiencies and mechanisms of chemical cleaning agents for nanofiltration membranes used in produced wastewater desalination.
Zhao D; Qiu L; Song J; Liu J; Wang Z; Zhu Y; Liu G
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():256-266. PubMed ID: 30366326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of reverse osmosis membrane fouling characteristics in full-scale leachate treatment systems with chemical coagulation and microfiltration pre-treatments.
Rukapan W; Khananthai B; Srisukphun T; Chiemchaisri W; Chiemchaisri C
Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(4):580-7. PubMed ID: 25746651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Graf von der Schulenburg DA; Kruithof JC; Johns ML; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):583-94. PubMed ID: 19058830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Membrane cleaning in membrane distillation of reverse osmosis concentrate generated in landfill leachate treatment.
Jia X; Li K; Wang B; Zhao Z; Hou D; Wang J
Water Sci Technol; 2022 Jan; 85(1):244-256. PubMed ID: 35050880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analyzing and verifying the association of spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane fouling with different secondary effluents: full-scale experiments.
Luo H; Cui Y; Zhang H; Li C; Wang Z; Song P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 711():135150. PubMed ID: 31818593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel scenario for biofouling control of spiral wound membrane systems.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Water Res; 2011 Jul; 45(13):3890-8. PubMed ID: 21592541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hydrogel-coated feed spacers in two-phase flow cleaning in spiral wound membrane elements: a novel platform for eco-friendly biofouling mitigation.
Wibisono Y; Yandi W; Golabi M; Nugraha R; Cornelissen ER; Kemperman AJ; Ederth T; Nijmeijer K
Water Res; 2015 Mar; 71():171-86. PubMed ID: 25616114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of spiral-wound membrane cleaning procedures to remove biofilms.
Hijnen WA; Castillo C; Brouwer-Hanzens AH; Harmsen DJ; Cornelissen ER; van der Kooij D
Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(19):6369-81. PubMed ID: 23021522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Membrane backwash cleaning using CO
Al-Ghamdi MA; Alhadidi A; Ghaffour N
Water Res; 2019 Nov; 165():114985. PubMed ID: 31445307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
