These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31500149)

  • 21. Membrane backwash cleaning using CO
    Al-Ghamdi MA; Alhadidi A; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2019 Nov; 165():114985. PubMed ID: 31445307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment.
    Weinrich L; LeChevallier M; Haas CN
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():203-213. PubMed ID: 27262548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of feed water biodegradable substrate concentration on biofouling: Biofilm characteristics, membrane performance and cleanability.
    Farhat NM; Javier L; Van Loosdrecht MCM; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2019 Mar; 150():1-11. PubMed ID: 30508707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and characterization of 3D-printed feed spacers for spiral wound membrane systems.
    Siddiqui A; Farhat N; Bucs SS; Linares RV; Picioreanu C; Kruithof JC; van Loosdrecht MC; Kidwell J; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():55-67. PubMed ID: 26773488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Desalination of mixed tannery effluent with membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis treatment.
    Scholz WG; Rougé P; Bódalo A; Leitz U
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(21):8505-11. PubMed ID: 16294894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Fouling reasons and cleaning methods of nanofiltration membrane filtrated with the effluent of membrane bioreactor].
    Chen JH; Huang X
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Sep; 29(9):2481-7. PubMed ID: 19068630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of biofilm accumulation on transmembrane and feed channel pressure drop: effects of crossflow velocity, feed spacer and biodegradable nutrient.
    Dreszer C; Flemming HC; Zwijnenburg A; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():200-11. PubMed ID: 24374131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phosphate limitation to control biofouling.
    Vrouwenvelder JS; Beyer F; Dahmani K; Hasan N; Galjaard G; Kruithof JC; Van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3454-66. PubMed ID: 20394959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhanced hydraulic cleanability of biofilms developed under a low phosphorus concentration in reverse osmosis membrane systems.
    Javier L; Farhat NM; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res X; 2021 Jan; 10():100085. PubMed ID: 33385157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
    Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Operating Characteristics and Fouling Characteristics of a RO Membrane System for Desalination of Dyeing Wastewater].
    Tan YJ; Zhang ZT; Wu QY; Yao Y; Hu HY; Qiu PW
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 May; 39(5):2249-2255. PubMed ID: 29965525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel Magnetic Resonance Measurements of Fouling in Operating Spiral Wound Reverse Osmosis Membrane Modules.
    Bristow NW; Vogt SJ; Bucs SS; Vrouwenvelder JS; Johns ML; Fridjonsson EO
    Water Res; 2021 May; 196():117006. PubMed ID: 33744656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?
    Malaeb L; Le-Clech P; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ayoub GM; Saikaly PE
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5447-63. PubMed ID: 23863390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance and autopsy of nanofiltration membranes at an oil-field wastewater desalination plant.
    Zhao D; Su C; Liu G; Zhu Y; Gu Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(3):2681-2690. PubMed ID: 30484043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Addressing reverse osmosis fouling within water reclamation--a side-by-side comparison of low-pressure membrane pretreatments.
    Kent FC; Farahbakhsh K
    Water Environ Res; 2011 Jun; 83(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 21751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of two-step cleaning sequences on foulant extraction from multibore ultrafiltration membranes in a pilot-scale membrane filtration system for surface water treatment.
    Rho H; Kim S; Shin J; Cho J; Lee YG; Chon K
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jun; 297():134164. PubMed ID: 35245596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of salt accumulation in the bioreactor on the performance of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+Reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation.
    Tay MF; Lee S; Xu H; Jeong K; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
    Water Res; 2020 Mar; 170():115352. PubMed ID: 31812816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting the impact of feed spacer modification on biofouling by hydraulic characterization and biofouling studies in membrane fouling simulators.
    Siddiqui A; Lehmann S; Bucs SS; Fresquet M; Fel L; Prest EIEC; Ogier J; Schellenberg C; van Loosdrecht MCM; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():281-287. PubMed ID: 28027527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Removal of Bacteria and Organic Carbon by an Integrated Ultrafiltration-Nanofiltration Desalination Pilot Plant.
    Rehman ZU; Khojah B; Leiknes T; Alsogair S; Alsomali M
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32899597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.